Type of argument that tries to redefine a correlative so that one alternative encompasses the other
The fallacy of suppressed correlative is a type of argument that tries to redefine a correlative (one of two mutually exclusive options) so that one alternative encompasses the other, i.e. making one alternative impossible.[1] This has also been known as the fallacy of lost contrast[2] and the fallacy of the suppressed relative.[3]
^Feinberg, Joel (2007). "Psychological Egoism". In Shafer-Landau, Russ (ed.). Ethical Theory: An Anthology. Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 193. ISBN 978-1-4051-3320-3.
^Chadwick, Ruth F., ed. (1998). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Vol. 2. Academic Press. p. 559. ISBN 978-0-12-227067-3.
^Bain 1884, p. 54
and 25 Related for: Suppressed correlative information
The fallacy of suppressedcorrelative is a type of argument that tries to redefine a correlative (one of two mutually exclusive options) so that one alternative...
improperly rejecting a claim for being imprecise. Correlative-based fallacies Suppressedcorrelative – a correlative is redefined so that one alternative is made...
mathematical combinatorics Scan statistic Correlative-based fallacies – Informal fallacies based on correlative conjunctions Cum hoc ergo propter hoc –...
The informal fallacy of denying the correlative is an attempt made at introducing alternatives where there are none. It is the opposite of the false dilemma...
Look up suppress, suppressant, suppressed, or suppression in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Suppression may refer to: Suppression of Communism Act Suppression...
stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting...