Informal fallacy that the truth is always a compromise, even if such a position is unfeasible
"Fallacy of gray" redirects here. The term may also refer to the continuum fallacy.
Argument to moderation (Latin: argumentum ad temperantiam)—also known as the false compromise, argument from middle ground, fallacy of gray, middle ground fallacy, or golden mean fallacy[1]—is the fallacy that the truth is always in the middle of two opposites.[2] It does not necessarily suggest that an argument for the middle solution or for a compromise is always fallacious, but rather applies primarily in cases where such a position is ill-informed, unfeasible, or impossible, or where an argument is incorrectly made that a position is correct simply because it is in the middle.[3][4]
An example of an argument to moderation would be considering two statements about the colour of the sky on Earth during the day – one claiming, correctly, that the sky is blue, and another claiming that it is yellow – and incorrectly concluding that the sky is the intermediate colour, green.[5]
^Fallacy: Middle Ground Archived 21 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine, The Nizkor Project (accessed 29 November 2012)
^Harker, David (2015). Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-06961-9. LCCN 2015011610.
^"Argument to Moderation". Logically Fallacious. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
^Rose, Hannah (17 May 2022). "False compromise fallacy: why the middle ground is not always the best". Ness Labs. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
^Gardner, Susan T. (2009). Thinking Your Way to Freedom: A Guide to Owning Your Own Practical Reasoning. Temple University Press. ISBN 978-1-59213-867-8. JSTOR j.ctt14btd4j. LCCN 2008023988.
and 28 Related for: Argument to moderation information
Argumenttomoderation (Latin: argumentum ad temperantiam)—also known as the false compromise, argument from middle ground, fallacy of gray, middle ground...
distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man". The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated...
may also therefore have become untrue. Appeal to novelty Argument from authority Argumenttomoderation Common sense Conservatism Herd mentality Inductive...
has quotations related toArgument from authority. An argument from authority (argumentum ab auctoritate), also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum...
conclusion. Informal fallacies – arguments that are logically unsound for lack of well-grounded premises. Argumenttomoderation (false compromise, middle ground...
for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical...
with what they are trying to end with. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy, but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are...
Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence")...
purpose of an argument is to give reasons for one's conclusion via justification, explanation, and/or persuasion. Arguments are intended to determine or...
In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming...
Ad nauseam is a Latin term for an argument or other discussion that has continued to the point of nausea. For example, "this has been discussed ad nauseam"...
called argumentto logic (argumentum ad logicam), the fallacy fallacy, the fallacist's fallacy, and the bad reasons fallacy. It has the general argument form:...
An argument from anecdote is an informal logical fallacy, where anecdotal evidence is presented as an argument; without any other contributory evidence...
Trilogy by Nick Bantock The golden-mean fallacy, another name for the argumenttomoderation Doctrine of the Golden Mean, a chapter in Li Ji, one of the Four...
Appeal to ridicule (also called appeal to mockery, ad absurdo, or the horse laugh) is an informal fallacy which presents an opponent's argument as absurd...
to ad hominem arguments which attack the speaker rather than addressing the claims, but in this case the ill feeling is not created by the argument;...
she described as an insincere pretense of ignorance as a way to disassemble an argument, saying "In contemporary internet slang, eironeia is «sealioning»...
emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence. This kind of appeal to emotion is irrelevant to or distracting from...
An appeal to pity (also called argumentum ad misericordiam, the sob story, or the Galileo argument) is a fallacy in which someone tries to win support...
Argument from analogy is a special type of inductive argument, where perceived similarities are used as a basis to infer some further similarity that has...
In a slippery slope argument, a course of action is rejected because the slippery slope advocate believes it will lead to a chain reaction resulting in...
more likely at some later time to try heroin, than someone who has never used marijuana. False equivalence arguments are often used in journalism and...
Appeal to consequences, also known as argumentum ad consequentiam (Latin for "argumentto the consequence"), is an argument that concludes a hypothesis...
To make an argument from silence (Latin: argumentum ex silentio) is to express a conclusion that is based on the absence of statements in historical documents...
argument (also called tone policing) is a type of ad hominem aimed at the tone of an argument instead of its factual or logical content in order to dismiss...
baculum (Latin for "argumentto the cudgel" or "appeal to the stick") is the fallacy committed when one makes an appeal to force to bring about the acceptance...
listen to my opponent, may I remind you that he has been in jail"). Therefore, the claims made by person A will be false. Poisoned-well arguments are sometimes...
conscious intent to mislead. The expression is mainly used to assert that an argument is not relevant to the issue being discussed. For example, "I think we...
Global Information