Global Information Lookup Global Information

Majority judgment information


Majority judgment (MJ) is a single-winner voting system proposed in 2010 by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki.[1][2][3] It is a kind of highest median rule, a cardinal voting system that elects the candidate with the highest median rating.

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Balinski, M.; Laraki, R. (2010). Majority Judgment. MIT. ISBN 978-0-262-01513-4.
  3. ^ de Swart, Harrie (2021-11-16). "How to Choose a President, Mayor, Chair: Balinski and Laraki Unpacked". The Mathematical Intelligencer. 44 (2): 99–107. doi:10.1007/s00283-021-10124-3. ISSN 0343-6993. S2CID 244289281.

and 24 Related for: Majority judgment information

Request time (Page generated in 0.8847 seconds.)

Majority judgment

Last Update:

Majority judgment (MJ) is a single-winner voting system proposed in 2010 by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki. It is a kind of highest median rule, a cardinal...

Word Count : 1857

Graduated majority judgment

Last Update:

Graduated majority judgment (GMJ), sometimes called the usual judgment or continuous Bucklin voting, is a single-winner electoral system. It was invented...

Word Count : 1150

Jacob Zuma contempt of court

Last Update:

sentenced Zuma to 15 months' imprisonment for contempt of court. The majority judgment was written by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Sisi Khampepe, who held...

Word Count : 4610

Bwanya v Master of the High Court

Last Update:

South Africa on 31 December 2021 with a majority judgment written by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga. A majority of the court upheld a challenge to the constitutionality...

Word Count : 2584

Majority rule

Last Update:

Majority rule is the principle that a group which has more than half of all voters should be allowed to make the decisions for a group. Majority rule is...

Word Count : 2124

President v Hugo

Last Update:

November 1996 and decided on 18 April 1997. The Constitutional Court's majority judgment was written by Justice Richard Goldstone, who overturned the Supreme...

Word Count : 1353

Doctors for Life v Speaker

Last Update:

merits of the application. Justice Sandile Ngcobo wrote the majority judgment, a lengthy judgment that drew heavily on the principle of participatory democracy...

Word Count : 2063

South African Police Service v Barnard

Last Update:

considered the constitutionality of employment equity measures. In a majority judgment written by Justice Dikgang Moseneke, the court upheld as lawful a...

Word Count : 1322

Minister of Finance v Van Heerden

Last Update:

affirmative action clause in section 9(2) of the Bill of Rights. In a majority judgment written by Justice Dikgang Moseneke, the court held that section 9(2)...

Word Count : 2329

Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v SARIPA

Last Update:

the Master of the High Court. Justice Chris Jafta wrote the court's majority judgment and a three-person minority joined a dissent written by Justice Mbuyiseli...

Word Count : 1310

Khosa v Minister of Social Development

Last Update:

represented by Paul Kennedy SC and the Legal Resources Centre. In a majority judgment written by Justice Yvonne Mokgoro, the Constitutional Court upheld...

Word Count : 916

S v M

Last Update:

The court's majority judgment was written by Justice Albie Sachs, and the full bench agreed with his exposition of section 28. The majority used this framework...

Word Count : 2150

Prince v Law Society

Last Update:

Justice) and Justice O'Regan were absent. The Constitutional Court's majority judgment was co written by Chief Justice Chaskalson and Justices Ackermann...

Word Count : 1559

Strategic voting

Last Update:

and majority judgment, they found that range voting had the highest (worst) strategic vulnerability, while their own method majority judgment had the...

Word Count : 7234

Electoral system

Last Update:

satisfaction approval voting, highest median rules (including the majority judgment), and the D21 – Janeček method where voters can cast positive and...

Word Count : 5911

Phillips v Director of Public Prosecutions

Last Update:

2003, Justice Zak Yacoob delivered judgment on behalf of a nine-member majority of the Constitutional Court. His judgment was joined by Chief Justice Arthur...

Word Count : 1304

Masetlha v President

Last Update:

Constitutional Court of South Africa. In a judgment written by Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke, the majority refused Masetlha's appeal but ordered the...

Word Count : 1459

Score voting

Last Update:

Utilitarian social choice rule Hot or Not — a real-world example Majority judgment — similar voting method, based on medians instead of averages "Score...

Word Count : 2994

Harksen v Lane

Last Update:

1997, Justice Richard Goldstone delivered judgment on behalf of the Constitutional Court's five-member majority, which also included Justices Arthur Chaskalson...

Word Count : 2034

Spoiler effect

Last Update:

voting. Rated methods such as approval voting, range voting, and majority judgment also pass. One may also consider a weakening of LIIA where only the...

Word Count : 3254

Comparison of electoral systems

Last Update:

equal-rankings allowed, meets the same criteria as Majority Judgment; in fact, Majority Judgment may be considered a form of Bucklin voting. Without...

Word Count : 6698

Competition Commission v Mediclinic Southern Africa

Last Update:

Constitutional Court delivered judgment on 15 October 2021. In a judgment written by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, an eight-member majority of the court ruled in...

Word Count : 993

Rated voting

Last Update:

highest median rules differ in their tie-breaking methods. Graduated majority judgment, the most common such rule. STAR (score then automatic runoff), which...

Word Count : 1831

Condorcet loser criterion

Last Update:

rate L close to their favorites. Thus, L is elected Majority Judgment winner. Hence, Majority Judgment fails the Condorcet loser criterion. This example...

Word Count : 1093

PDF Search Engine © AllGlobal.net