In social choice theory and politics, the spoiler effect refers to a situation where the entry of a losing (that is, irrelevant) candidate affects the results of an election.[1][2] A voting system that is not affected by spoilers satisfies independence of irrelevant alternatives or independence of spoilers.
By Arrow's theorem, all ranked-choice voting systems[note 1] are vulnerable to spoiler effects. However, the susceptibility of different ranked systems varies greatly. Plurality and the two-round system suffer frequent[citation needed] spoiler effects that can substantially affect the outcome of the race.[2][3] Majority-rule systems are usually not affected by spoilers, which are limited to rare[4][5] situations known as cyclic ties.[6]
Rated voting systems are not subject to Arrow's theorem; as a result, many satisfy independence of irrelevant alternatives (sometimes called spoilerproofness).[7][8]
^Heckelman, Jac C.; Miller, Nicholas R. (2015-12-18). Handbook of Social Choice and Voting. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 9781783470730. A spoiler effect occurs when a single party or a candidate entering an election changes the outcome to favor a different candidate.
^ ab"The Spoiler Effect". The Center for Election Science. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
^Borgers, Christoph (2010-01-01). Mathematics of Social Choice: Voting, Compensation, and Division. SIAM. ISBN 9780898716955. Candidates C and D spoiled the election for B ... With them in the running, A won, whereas without them in the running, B would have won. ... Instant runoff voting ... does not do away with the spoiler problem entirely, although it ... makes it less likely
^Gehrlein, William V. (2002-03-01). "Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences*". Theory and Decision. 52 (2): 171–199. doi:10.1023/A:1015551010381. ISSN 1573-7187.
^Van Deemen, Adrian (2014-03-01). "On the empirical relevance of Condorcet's paradox". Public Choice. 158 (3): 311–330. doi:10.1007/s11127-013-0133-3. ISSN 1573-7101.
^Holliday, Wesley H.; Pacuit, Eric (2023-02-11), Stable Voting, arXiv:2108.00542, retrieved 2024-03-11. "This is a kind of stability property of Condorcet winners: you cannot dislodge a Condorcet winner A by adding a new candidate B to the election if A beats B in a head-to-head majority vote. For example, although the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election in Florida did not use ranked ballots, it is plausible (see Magee 2003) that Al Gore (A) would have won without Ralph Nader (B) in the election, and Gore would have beaten Nader head-to-head. Thus, Gore should still have won with Nader included in the election."
^"The Spoiler Effect". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-20. Retrieved 2017-01-29.
^Poundstone, William. (2013). Gaming the vote : why elections aren't fair (and what we can do about it). Farrar, Straus and Giroux. pp. 168, 197, 234. ISBN 9781429957649. OCLC 872601019. IRV is subject to something called the "center squeeze." A popular moderate can receive relatively few first-place votes through no fault of her own but because of vote splitting from candidates to the right and left. ... Approval voting thus appears to solve the problem of vote splitting simply and elegantly. ... Range voting solves the problems of spoilers and vote splitting
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).
In social choice theory and politics, the spoilereffect refers to a situation where the entry of a losing (that is, irrelevant) candidate affects the...
Look up Spoiler or spoiler in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Spoiler or Spoilers may refer to: Spoiler candidate, a losing candidate or option that affects...
of winning for a dissimilar candidate. This is commonly known as the spoilereffect, which can discourage minor party candidacies. Vote splitting most easily...
playoffs can affect other teams in the league as they play, often having a spoilereffect on teams still in contention for playoff spots. For example, a baseball...
their votes. The spoilereffect is the effect of vote splitting between candidates or ballot questions with similar ideologies. One spoiler candidate's presence...
have maintained that they did not spoil these elections. Various independent analyses have found that a spoilereffect does exist, but have been inconclusive...
candidate, who would help President Donald Trump win reelection via a spoilereffect. The media understood Clinton to be referring to Gabbard, which Nick...
Dennis Pyle, who was on the ballot as an independent, would have a spoilereffect benefiting Kelly. This was the first gubernatorial election in Kansas...
Ashton-under-Lyne by-election and subsequent by-elections, arguably had a spoilereffect in splitting the left-wing vote and allowing Conservative candidates...
political parties in the United States Progressivism in the United States Spoilereffect Third party (U.S. politics) Does not include 30,992 votes from 2018...
part due to running too many candidates and thus falling prey to the spoilereffect. The biggest winner among the opposition was Kōmeitō, which saw an increase...
where any ranked voting system that respects majorities must have a spoilereffect. Suppose we have three candidates, A, B, and C, and that there are three...
to ensure one of the majority-preferred candidates wins, creating a spoilereffect. The common choose-one first-past-the-post voting method is notable...
systems' tendencies to encourage insincere voting and to facilitate the spoilereffect.: ch. 1 Multi-party systems are systems in which more than two parties...
run for president as an independent. Due to concerns about a possible spoilereffect, many Democrats urged Nader to abandon his 2004 candidacy. Terry McAuliffe...
electoral systems by country Matrix vote Preferential block voting Spoilereffect Voting methods in deliberative assemblies "Bill Status H.424: An act...
Global Information
Politics portal