This article is about the debate over responsibility for World War I. For the notion of collective guilt for the Holocaust, see German collective guilt.
Part of a series on the
History of Germany
Topics
Chronology
Historiography
Military history
Economic history
Healthcare
Islam
LGBT history
Jewish history
Women's history
Territorial evolution
Historic states (Holy Roman Empire)
Monarchs (Queens, Empresses, 1918, Family tree, Austria, Bavaria, Prussia, Saxony, Württemberg, Mediatised)
Early history
Germanic peoples
Migration Period
Barbarian kingdoms
Frankish Empire
Middle Ages
East Francia
Kingdom of Germany
Holy Roman Empire
Eastward settlement
Early Modern period
Sectionalism
18th century
Kingdom of Prussia
Unification
Mediatisation
Confederation of the Rhine
German Confederation
Zollverein
German revolutions of 1848–1849
North German Confederation
German Reich
German Empire
1871–1918
World War I
1914–1918
Weimar Republic
1918–1933
Nazi Germany
1933–1945
World War II
1939–1945
Contemporary Germany
Occupation
Ostgebiete
1945–1949/1952
Expulsion of Germans
1944–1950
West–East division
1949–1990
Reunification
New states
1990
Modern history
since 1990
Germany portal
History portal
v
t
e
The war guilt question (German: Kriegsschuldfrage) is the public debate that took place in Germany for the most part during the Weimar Republic, to establish Germany's share of responsibility in the causes of the First World War. Structured in several phases, and largely determined by the impact of the Treaty of Versailles and the attitude of the victorious Allies, this debate also took place in other countries involved in the conflict, such as in the French Third Republic and the United Kingdom.
The war guilt debate motivated historians such as Hans Delbrück, Wolfgang J. Mommsen, Gerhard Hirschfeld, and Fritz Fischer, but also a much wider circle including intellectuals such as Kurt Tucholsky and Siegfried Jacobsohn, as well as the general public. The war guilt question pervaded the history of the Weimar Republic. Founded shortly before the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in June 1919, Weimar embodied this debate until its demise, after which it was subsequently taken up as a campaign argument by the Nazi Party.
While the war guilt question made it possible to investigate the deep-rooted causes of the First World War, although not without provoking a great deal of controversy, it also made it possible to identify other aspects of the conflict, such as the role of the masses and the question of Germany's special path to democracy, the Sonderweg. This debate, which obstructed German political progress for many years, also showed that politicians such as Gustav Stresemann were able to confront the war guilt question by advancing the general discussion without compromising German interests.
A century later, debate continues into the 21st century. The main outlines of the debate include: how much diplomatic and political room to maneuver was available; the inevitable consequences of pre-war armament policies; the role of domestic policy and social and economic tensions in the foreign relations of the states involved; the role of public opinion and their experience of war in the face of organized propaganda;[1] the role of economic interests and top military commanders in torpedoing deescalation and peace negotiations; the Sonderweg theory; and the long-term trends which tend to contextualise the First World War as a condition or preparation for the Second, such as Raymond Aron who views the two world wars as the new Thirty Years' War, a theory reprised by Enzo Traverso in his work.[2]
^Thoss 1994, p. 1012-1039.
^Traverso 2017, PT35.
and 25 Related for: War guilt question information
The warguiltquestion (German: Kriegsschuldfrage) is the public debate that took place in Germany for the most part during the Weimar Republic, to establish...
Reprisal State responsibility War crime WarGuilt Clause Warguiltquestion Wiedergutmachung Vergangenheitsbewältigung White guilt Beattie, Andrew H. (2019)...
The Reichstag inquiry into guilt for World War I was a parliamentary committee in Weimar Germany that was tasked with investigating the events that had...
known as the "WarGuilt" clause, was the opening article of the reparations section of the Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War between the...
is an academic discipline which uses a narrative to describe, examine, question, and analyze past events, and investigate their patterns of cause and effect...
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I was about 40 million: estimates range from around 15 to 22 million deaths and about...
Germany was charged with the sole responsibility of starting World War I, and the WarGuilt Clause was the first step to satisfying revenge for the victor...
cultural turn in the 21st century. Scholars have raised entirely new questions regarding military occupation, radicalisation of politics, race, medical...
Renaissance as a term and as a historical delineation. Some observers have questioned whether the Renaissance was a cultural "advance" from the Middle Ages...
connection with, in the words of Wilhelm Max Müller, "the most important questions of ethnography and the primitive history of classic nations". The Sea...
occupation as part of the Western Front in World War II. The Western Front was a military theatre of World War II encompassing Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg...
the Argentine Government's Official Website See Selig Adler, "The War-GuiltQuestion and American Disillusionment, 1918–1928", Journal of Modern History...
European Civil War is a concept meant to characterize a series of 19th- and 20th-century conflicts in Europe as segments of an overarching civil war within a...
was abandoned as a consequence of anti-German feelings following World War I. Most continental European countries still maintain the term to designate...
all-out commercial war against France, which caused the restrictions that were imposed on American merchant ships. On the question of trade with America...
Jesus is the question of whether or not Jesus of Nazareth historically existed (as opposed to being a purely mythical figure). The question of historicity...
[citation needed] The respondents were asked, among other historical questions, to rate all the 20th-century prime ministers in terms of their success...
with the First Opium War in 1839, and ending in 1945 with China (then the Republic of China) emerging out of the Second World War as one of the Big Four...
greatness taken February 2–5, 2011, asked 1,015 American adults the following question: "Who do you regard as the greatest United States president?" Ronald Reagan...
religious orthodoxy—an attitude captured by Kant's essay Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?, where the phrase sapere aude ('dare to know')...
narratives exist for the historic events in question; nationalist perspectives are further divided by the Civil War which ended the revolutionary period. The...