Quadratic voting is a collective decision-making procedure which involves individuals allocating votes to express the degree of their preferences, rather than just the direction of their preferences.[1] By doing so, quadratic voting seeks to address issues of the Condorcet paradox and majority rule. Quadratic voting works by allowing users to "pay" for additional votes on a given matter to express their support for given issues more strongly, resulting in voting outcomes that are aligned with the highest willingness to pay outcome, rather than just the outcome preferred by the majority regardless of the intensity of individual preferences. The payment for votes may be through either artificial or real currencies (e.g. with tokens distributed equally among voting members or with real money).[2][1] Quadratic voting is a variant of cumulative voting. It differs from cumulative voting by altering "the cost" and "the vote" relation from linear to quadratic.
Quadratic voting is based upon market principles, where each voter is given a budget of vote credits that they have the personal decisions and delegation to spend in order to influence the outcome of a range of decisions. If a participant has a strong support for or against a specific decision, additional votes could be allocated to proportionally demonstrate the voter's support. A vote pricing rule determines the cost of additional votes, with each vote becoming increasingly more expensive. By increasing voter credit costs, this demonstrates an individual's support and interests toward the particular decision.[3] If money is used, it is eventually cycled back to the voters based upon per capita. Both E. Glen Weyl and Steven Lalley published research in 2017 in which they claim to demonstrate that this decision-making policy expedites efficiency as the number of voters increases.[4] The simplified formula on how quadratic voting functions is[5]
cost to the voter = (number of votes)2.
Vote pricing example
Number of votes
"Vote credit" cost
1
1
2
4
3
9
4
16
5
25
The quadratic nature of the voting suggests that a voter can use their votes more efficiently by spreading them across many issues. For example, a voter with a budget of 16 vote credits can apply 1 vote credit to each of the 16 issues. However, if the individual has a stronger passion or sentiment on an issue, they could allocate 4 votes, at the cost of 16 credits, to the singular issue, effectively using up their entire budget.
This mechanism towards voting demonstrates[according to whom?] that there is a large incentive to buy and sell votes, or to trade votes. Using this anonymous ballot system provides identity protection from vote buying or trading, since these exchanges cannot be verified by the buyer or trader.[6]
^ abLalley, Steven; Weyl, E. Glen (24 December 2017). "Quadratic Voting: How Mechanism Design Can Radicalize Democracy". SSRN 2003531.
^Posner, Eric A.; Weyl, E. Glen (2018). Radical markets: uprooting capitalism and democracy for a just society. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691177502. OCLC 1030268293.
^Posner, Eric (30 December 2014). "Quadratic voting". ERIC POSNER. Retrieved 9 October 2019.
^Weyl, E. Glen (1 July 2017). "The robustness of quadratic voting". Public Choice. 172 (1): 75–107. doi:10.1007/s11127-017-0405-4. ISSN 1573-7101. S2CID 189841584.
^Ellenberg, Jordan (16 January 2015). "Saving Democracy With Quadratic Equations". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 19 November 2019.
^Hasen, Richard L. (2000). "Vote Buying". California Law Review. 88 (5): 1323–1371. doi:10.2307/3481262. ISSN 0008-1221. JSTOR 3481262.
voting is a variant of cumulative voting. It differs from cumulative voting by altering "the cost" and "the vote" relation from linear to quadratic....
optimal provision of public goods, using a version of quadraticvoting. As of August 2022, quadratic funding had been used to allocate over $20 million to...
Weyl helped create a collective decision-making procedure known as quadraticvoting, designed to allow fine-grained expression of how strongly voters feel...
independence before majority rule (NIBMAR) Ochlocracy QuadraticvotingVoting system criterion Voting system Bristow-Johnson, R. (2023). "The failure of...
Cumulative voting (also accumulation voting, weighted voting or multi-voting) is a multiple-winner method intended to promote more proportional representation...
Independence of irrelevant alternatives Instant-runoff voting Nakamura number Quadraticvoting Rock paper scissors Simpson's paradox Smith set Marquis...
Condorcet method and quadraticvoting (including quadratic funding). Electronic referendum (or E-referendum) is a referendum in which voting is aided by electronic...
proposed quadraticvoting (QV) system, shareholders would not be entitled to voting rights along with their shares. Instead, a market for votes would be...
Moreover, the gradient of this objective function can be computed using quadraticvoting. For more general non-satiating utility functions, the Lindahl equilibrium...
unusual input method: quadraticvoting. In years prior to 2022, Lille used a jury to make decisions, not a vote. This is the number of votes for regional projects...
among the projects. Quadraticvoting: similar to cumulative voting, but the price of putting points on projects increases quadratically rather than linearly...
Friedrich Gauss (1777–1855) proved the law of quadratic reciprocity and developed the theory of quadratic forms (in particular, defining their composition)...
free-rider problem. They suggest a mechanism called Quadratic Finance, inspired by quadraticvoting. The amount received by each project x is ( ∑ i c i...
problem is a quadratic function of the c i {\displaystyle c_{i}} subject to linear constraints, it is efficiently solvable by quadratic programming algorithms...
Winner-takes-all voting systems tend to result in only two viable parties First-past-the-post voting – Electoral system where voters vote for one candidate...
approximate to the round shape of a ger. Further enlargement led to a quadratic shape of the temples. The roofs were made in the shape of marquées. The...
NYU Law School “Trading Votes for Votes. An Experiment” (with Thomas Palfrey), May 2017 “Storable Votes and QuadraticVoting. An Experiment on Four California...
developed a better approach to the n-body problem in linearithmic instead of quadratic time. From July 2005 to July 2006, he was a visiting researcher at the...
Estimation. NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2000. ISBN 978-0-13-022464-4. Indefinite Quadratic Estimation and Control: A Unified Approach to H2 and H∞ Theories. PA:...
elements have no reliable comparison function (crowdsourced preferences like voting systems), comparisons are very costly (sports), or when it would be impossible...
classical algorithms. Though these algorithms give comparably modest quadratic speedup, they are widely applicable and thus give speedups for a wide...
(Anlauf and Biehl, 1989)). AdaTron uses the fact that the corresponding quadratic optimization problem is convex. The perceptron of optimal stability, together...