Not to be confused with political science or science policy.
For the process by which ideas, entities and facts become political, see politicization.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate.(January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(January 2022)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
The politicization of science for political gain occurs when government, business, or advocacy groups use legal or economic pressure to influence the findings of scientific research or the way it is disseminated, reported or interpreted. The politicization of science may also negatively affect academic and scientific freedom, and as a result it is considered taboo to mix politics with science. Historically, groups have conducted various campaigns to promote their interests in defiance of scientific consensus, and in an effort to manipulate public policy.[1][2][3]
^"Evolution or design debate heats up". Discovery Institute. December 1, 2004.
^"Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to "critically analyze" evolution or to understand "the controversy." But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one."
"AAAS Statement on the Teaching of Evolution" (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. 16 February 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 February 2012.
^Intelligent Judging – Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom George J. Annas, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 354:2277–2281 May 25, 2006
and 27 Related for: Politicization of science information
politicizationofscience include the global warming controversy, health effects of pesticides, and health effects of tobacco. Criticism ofscience List...
The concept of team science is a field of scientific philosophy and methodology which advocates using cross-disciplinary collaboration from diverse scientific...
Scienceofscience policy (SoSP) is an emerging interdisciplinary research area that seeks to develop theoretical and empirical models of the scientific...
Science education is the teaching and learning ofscience to school children, college students, or adults within the general public. The field of science...
Office ofScience and Technology Policy Patent Politicizationofscience Right to science and culture Scienceofscience policy Small Science Self-Organized...
and the politicization and polarization ofscience. For decades, science communication research has had only limited influence on science communication...
and consequences ofscience and technology in their historical, cultural, and social contexts. Like most interdisciplinary fields of study, STS emerged...
reception of scientific knowledge and its epistemic and semiotic role. Similarly to cultural studies, science studies are defined by the subject of their...
politicization; see English spelling differences) is a concept in political science and theory used to explain how ideas, entities or collections of facts...
The history ofscience covers the development ofscience from ancient times to the present. It encompasses all three major branches ofscience: natural,...
philosophical, and political implications. Philosophers debate the nature ofscience and the general criteria for drawing the line between scientific theories...
The science wars were a series of scholarly and public discussions in the 1990s over the social place ofscience in making authoritative claims about the...
the politics ofscience. Politicizationofscience – politicizationofscience is the manipulation ofscience for political gain. Science by press release...
The relationship between religion and science involves discussions that interconnect the study of the natural world, history, philosophy, and theology...
pseudoscience Lysenkoism Mertonian norms Metascience Pathological science Politicizationofscience Reproducibility Research ethics Research integrity Research paper...
method for acquiring knowledge that has characterized the development ofscience since at least the 17th century. The scientific method involves careful...
position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles...
Criticism ofscience addresses problems within science in order to improve science as a whole and its role in society. Criticisms come from philosophy...
The history ofscience and technology (HST) is a field of history that examines the understanding of the natural world (science) and the ability to manipulate...
any funding for scientific research, in the areas of natural science, technology, and social science. Different methods can be used to disburse funding...
structured group of people who research and develop a project, often with a very large degree of autonomy, primarily for the sake of radical innovation...
acceptance ofscience, particularly on topics that have become politically polarized, such as vaccines and climate change. The politicizationofscience poses...
vary considerably both within and between humanities and sciences. There are several forms of research: scientific, humanities, artistic, economic, social...
Kim (2013). "The dynamics of Silicon Valley: Creative destruction and the evolution of the innovation habitat". Social Science Information. 52 (4): 539–557...