The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's relationship to history—covering not just the Bible's acceptability as history but also the ability to understand the literary forms of biblical narrative.[1] One can extend biblical historicity to the evaluation of whether or not the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the Apostolic Age. This tends to vary depending upon the opinion of the scholar.
When studying the books of the Bible, scholars examine the historical context of passages, the importance ascribed to events by the authors, and the contrast between the descriptions of these events and other historical evidence. Being a collaborative work composed and redacted over the course of several centuries,[2] the historicity of the Bible is not consistent throughout the entirety of its contents.
According to theologian Thomas L. Thompson, a representative of the Copenhagen School, also known as "biblical minimalism", the archaeological record lends sparse and indirect evidence for the Old Testament's narratives as history.[3][4][5][6][7] Others, like archaeologist William G. Dever, felt that biblical archaeology has both confirmed and challenged the Old Testament stories.[8] While Dever has criticized the Copenhagen School for its more radical approach, he is far from being a biblical literalist, and thinks that the purpose of biblical archaeology is not to simply support or discredit the biblical narrative, but to be a field of study in its own right.[9][10]
Some scholars argue that the Bible is national history, with an "imaginative entertainment factor that proceeds from artistic expression" or a "midrash" on history.[11][12]
^Thompson 2014, p. 164.
^Greifenhagen, Franz V. (2003). Egypt on the Pentateuch's Ideological Map. Bloomsbury. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-567-39136-0.
^Enns 2013: "Biblical archaeology has helped us understand a lot about the world of the Bible and clarified a considerable amount of what we find in the Bible. But the archaeological record has not been friendly for one vital issue, Israel's origins: the period of slavery in Egypt, the mass departure of Israelite slaves from Egypt, and the violent conquest of the land of Canaan by the Israelites. The strong consensus is that there is at best sparse indirect evidence for these biblical episodes, and for the conquest there is considerable evidence against it."
^
Davies, Philip (April 2010). "Beyond Labels: What Comes Next?". The Bible and Interpretation. Retrieved 2016-05-31. It has been accepted for decades that the Bible is not in principle either historically reliable or unreliable, but both: it contains both memories of real events and also fictions.
^Golden 2009, p. 275: "So although much of the archaeological evidence demonstrates that the Hebrew Bible cannot in most cases be taken literally, many of the people, places and things probably did exist at some time or another."
^Grabbe 2007: "The fact is that we are all minimalists—at least, when it comes to the patriarchal period and the settlement. When I began my PhD studies more than three decades ago in the USA, the 'substantial historicity' of the patriarchs was widely accepted as was the unified conquest of the land. These days it is quite difficult to find anyone who takes this view.
"In fact, until recently I could find no 'maximalist' history of Israel since Wellhausen. ... In fact, though, 'maximalist' has been widely defined as someone who accepts the biblical text unless it can be proven wrong. If so, very few are willing to operate like this, not even John Bright (1980) whose history is not a maximalist one according to the definition just given."
^Nur Masalha (20 October 2014). The Zionist Bible: Biblical Precedent, Colonialism and the Erasure of Memory. Routledge. p. 228. ISBN 978-1-317-54465-4. critical archaeology—which has become an independent professional discipline with its own conclusions and its observations—presents us with a picture of a reality of ancient Palestine completely different from the one that is described in the Hebrew Bible; Holy Land archaeology is no longer using the Hebrew Bible as a reference point or an historical source; the traditional biblical archaeology is no longer the ruling paradigm in Holy Land archaeology; for the critical archaeologists the Bible is read like other ancient texts: as literature which may contain historical information (Herzog, 2001: 72–93; 1999: 6–8).
^Dever, William G. (March–April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk". Biblical Archaeology Review. 32 (2): 26 & 76. "Archaeology as it is practiced today must be able to challenge, as well as confirm, the Bible stories. Some things described there really did happen, but others did not. The biblical narratives about Abraham, Moses, Joshua and Solomon probably reflect some historical memories of people and places, but the "larger than life" portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and contradicted by the archaeological evidence."
^William G. Dever (1992). "Archeology". In David Noel Freedman (ed.). The Anchor Bible dictionary. Doubleday. p. 358. ISBN 978-0-385-19361-0.
^J.K. Hoffmeier (2015). Thomas E. Levy; Thomas Schneider; William H.C. Propp (eds.). Israel's Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective: Text, Archaeology, Culture, and Geoscience. Springer. p. 200. ISBN 978-3-319-04768-3.
^Dearman, J. Andrew (2018). Reading Hebrew Bible Narratives. Oxford University Press. pp. 113–129. ISBN 9780190246525.
^Hendel, Ronald (2005). Remembering Abraham: Culture, Memory, and History in the Hebrew Bible. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–30. ISBN 9780199784622.
and 24 Related for: Historicity of the Bible information
studies of religion. In these cases, value commitments can influence the choice of research methodology. HistoricityoftheBibleHistoricityof Jesus Historicity...
for biblical scholars and historians of Early Christianity as part ofthe debate over thehistoricityoftheBible. Historical reliability is not dependent...
of antiquity agree that Jesus of Nazareth existed in 1st century Judea, but scholars differ on thehistoricityof specific episodes described in the biblical...
concerns about ethics in the Bible, about biblical inerrancy, or about thehistoricityoftheBible, there remain some questions of biblical authorship and...
the aim of confirming thehistoricityoftheBible. Between the 1920s, right after World War I, when Palestine came under British rule and the 1960s, biblical...
Thehistoricityof Muhammad refers to the study of Muhammad as a historical figure and critical examination of sources upon which traditional accounts...
Development of the Old Testament canon Historical criticism HistoricityoftheBible Jewish apocrypha List of Old Testament pseudepigrapha Mosaic authorship New...
on thehistoricityoftheBible and Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) narratives, the role of women in the Abrahamic religions and the development ofthe Biblical...
Bible portal Apollo 8 Genesis reading while in lunar orbit Biblical criticism Criticism oftheBible Dating theBible Enûma Eliš Historicityofthe Bible...
claims of certain psychoactive fungi analogizing the Eucharist, spoken in a live lecture in the 1990s. Healers ofthe Dead Sea Historicityof Jesus James...
despite supporting thehistoricityoftheBible, Kitchen also criticizes biblical archaeology as it was conceived in the first half ofthe 20th century, particularly...
(English: The Denial oftheHistoricityof Jesus in Past and Present) was a 1926 book in German by Arthur Drews on Christ myth theory. The book is a historical...
a minimalist or a maximalist position are now being expressed. HistoricityoftheBible Biblical maximalism Moore & Kelle 2011, p. 33. Banks 2006, p. 185...
Biblical maximalism is the movement in Biblical scholarship that, as opposed to Biblical minimalism, affirms thehistoricityof central Biblical narratives...
Historical Jesus?. Bible and Interpretation, 2014. Larry Hurtad. Gee, Dr. Carrier, You’re Really Upset! 2017. Carrier, On theHistoricityof Jesus, p. 577...
Historical background ofthe New Testament Historical reliability ofthe Gospels HistoricityoftheBible Jesus in comparative mythology List of Christ myth theory...
TheBible (from Koine Greek τὰ βιβλία, tà biblía, 'the books') is a collection of religious texts or scriptures, some, all, or a variant of which are...
Testament Bible History, originally published 1876–1887, ISBN 156563165X, p. 134 Douglas Petrovich. "Amenhotep II and theHistoricityofthe Exodus Pharaoh"...