Foundationalism information

Foundationalism concerns philosophical theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises.^[1] The main rival of the foundationalist theory of justification is the coherence theory of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.^[1]

Identifying the alternatives as either circular reasoning or infinite regress, and thus exhibiting the regress problem, Aristotle made foundationalism his own clear choice, positing basic beliefs underpinning others.^[2] Descartes, the most famed foundationalist, discovered a foundation in the fact of his own existence and in the "clear and distinct" ideas of reason,^[1]^[2] whereas Locke found a foundation in experience. Differing foundations may reflect differing epistemological emphases—empiricists emphasizing experience, rationalists emphasizing reason—but may blend both.^[1]

In the 1930s, debate over foundationalism revived.^[2] Whereas Moritz Schlick viewed scientific knowledge like a pyramid where a special class of statements does not require verification through other beliefs and serves as a foundation, Otto Neurath argued that scientific knowledge lacks an ultimate foundation and acts like a raft.^[2] In the 1950s, foundationalism fell into decline – largely due to the influence of Willard Van Orman Quine,^[2] whose ontological relativity found any belief networked^{[clarification needed]} to one's beliefs on all of reality, while auxiliary beliefs somewhere in the vast network are readily modified to protect desired beliefs.

Classically, foundationalism had posited infallibility of basic beliefs and deductive reasoning between beliefs—a strong foundationalism.^[2] Around 1975, weak foundationalism emerged.^[2] Thus recent foundationalists have variously allowed fallible basic beliefs, and inductive reasoning between them, either by enumerative induction or by inference to the best explanation.^[2] And whereas internalists require cognitive access to justificatory means, externalists find justification without such access.

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h Ted Poston, "Foundationalism" (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

[foundationalism-1] Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.

[Poston-2] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h Ted Poston, "Foundationalism" (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Foundationalism information

and 25 Related for: Foundationalism information

Foundationalism

Knowledge

Infinite regress

Verificationism

Basic belief

Coherentism

Rationality

Epistemology

Metaphysics

Religious epistemology

Stoicism

Logic

Taoism

Anarchism

Ethics

Immanuel Kant

Materialism

Philosophy

Pythagoreanism

Determinism

Friedrich Nietzsche

Ludwig Wittgenstein

Classical liberalism

Postfoundationalism

Kabbalah

Epistemology
Part of a series on
Outline Category Index
Schools Coherentism Contextualism Dogmatism Empiricism Fallibilism Foundationalism Infallibilism Infinitism Naturalism Perspectivism Pragmatism Rationalism Relativism Skepticism Solipsism Structuralism
Concepts Action Analytic–synthetic distinction A priori and a posteriori Belief Credence Certainty Data Experience Information Justification Induction Knowledge Meaning Rationality Reason Truth Wisdom
Domains Applied epistemology Evolutionary epistemology Formal epistemology Historical epistemology Metaepistemology Social epistemology Virtue epistemology
Epistemologists Aristotle Sextus Empiricus Edmund Gettier Wang Yangming René Descartes David Hume Immanuel Kant W. V. O. Quine more...
Related fields Epistemic cognition Epistemic logic Philosophy of perception Philosophy of science
v t e