Acceptance of responsibility is a provision in the United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines providing for a decrease by 2 or 3 levels in offenders' offense level for admitting guilt and otherwise demonstrating behavior consistent with acceptance of responsibility, such as ending criminal conduct and associations. It amounts to a sentence reduction of about 35%.[1] The 3-level reduction is only available to defendants with an offense level of 16 or greater, and it requires a timely guilty plea. Federal plea agreements usually include a stipulation that the government will support granting the defendant the acceptance of responsibility reduction. The guideline states, in reference to the 2-level reduction:[2]
This adjustment is not intended to apply to a defendant who puts the government to its burden of proof at trial by denying the essential factual elements of guilt, is convicted, and only then admits guilt and expresses remorse. Conviction by trial, however, does not automatically preclude a defendant from consideration for such a reduction. In rare situations a defendant may clearly demonstrate an acceptance of responsibility for his criminal conduct even though he exercises his constitutional right to a trial. This may occur, for example, where a defendant goes to trial to assert and preserve issues that do not relate to factual guilt (e.g., to make a constitutional challenge to a statute or a challenge to the applicability of a statute to his conduct). In each such instance, however, a determination that a defendant has accepted responsibility will be based primarily upon pre-trial statements and conduct.
Because the vast majority of federal criminal cases are settled by plea bargains, the application of this reduction is extremely common and has a great impact on the number of prisoner-years served altogether throughout the U.S. justice system. Research indicates that the offender's race/ethnicity, controlling for offender and offense characteristics, has a significant influence on the sentence reduction for acceptance of responsibility.[3] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that "lack of remorse" and "acceptance of responsibility" can be separate factors and that a district court may consider each independently of the other.[4] The concept of remorse, within the framework of federal sentencing law, has been described as posing epistemological problems.[5] Some courts use the "acceptance of responsibility" guideline to impose harsher punishments on defendants whose lawyers engage in aggressive forms of representation, such as making factually or legally dubious arguments, seeking tactical delays, or misleading the court.[6] Whether or not a defendant has accepted responsibility for his crime is a factual determination to which most circuits have decided to apply the "clearly erroneous" standard of review.[7] The guideline commentary states, "The reduction of offense level provided by this section recognizes legitimate societal interests. For several reasons, a defendant who clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense by taking, in a timely fashion, the actions listed above (or some equivalent action) is appropriately given a lower offense level than a defendant who has not demonstrated acceptance of responsibility." However, the specific "several reasons" are not provided.[2] A defendant cannot be denied the reduction in sentence provided by § 3E1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines because he refused to make self-incriminating statements relating to conduct included in counts to which he had not pleaded guilty and which were dismissed as part of a plea agreement.[8]
^Bibas, Stephanos (2001–2002), Apprendi and the Dynamics of Guilty Pleas, vol. 54, Stan. L. Rev., p. 311
^ abU.S.S.G. §3E1.1, archived from the original on 2010-02-21
^Ronald S. Everett; Barbara C. Nienstedt (March 1999), "Race, remorse, and sentence reduction: Is saying you're sorry enough?", Justice Quarterly, 16 (1): 99–122, doi:10.1080/07418829900094071{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^United States v. Douglas (5th Cir. May 29, 2009), Text.
Preview warning: Page using Template:Cite court with unknown parameter "number"
^O'Hear, Michael M. (1996–1997), Remorse, Cooperation, and Acceptance of Responsibility: The Structure, Implementation, and Reform of Section 3E1.1 of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, vol. 91, Nw. U. L. Rev., p. 1507
^Etienne, Margareth (2003), Remorse, Responsibility, and Regulating Advocacy: Making Defendants Pay for the Sins of Their Lawyers, p. 2103
^US v. Gonzalez, 897 F. 2d 1018 (9th Circuit 1990).
^US v. Oliveras, 905 F. 2d 623 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1990
and 23 Related for: Acceptance of responsibility information
Acceptanceofresponsibility is a provision in the United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines providing for a decrease by 2 or 3 levels in offenders'...
Acceptance in human psychology is a person's recognition and assent to the finality of a situation without attempting to change or protest it. This plays...
that he had never given the order for the attack. Acceptanceofresponsibility was part of a series of requirements laid out by a UN resolution for sanctions...
and physical courage, both the acceptanceofresponsibility and the suppression of fear. In order to survive the horror of combat[,] he must have an invincible...
properly be considered to support a sentence mitigation for acceptanceofresponsibility, the Sixth Amendment is violated when failure to plead guilty...
prosecutorial motion a prerequisite for a three-level reduction for acceptanceofresponsibility. It also instructed the Sentencing Commission to authorize four-level...
and project management, a responsibility assignment matrix (RAM), also known as RACI matrix (/ˈreɪsi/) or linear responsibility chart (LRC), is a model...
detailed account of the offense; acknowledgment of the hurt or damage done; acceptanceof the responsibility for, and ownership of, the act or omission;...
eventualities may prove that I decided in error, but with the acceptanceofresponsibility in any case. Leading libertarian philosophers such as Robert...
harm through the acknowledgement of wrongdoing and through in-kind and monetary means. Acceptanceofresponsibility, followed by undertaking that address...
equate acceptanceofresponsibility. ... Full acceptanceofresponsibility entails facing those harmed by her negligence and taking responsibility for her...
acknowledgement of his crimes, his agreement to go to prison, and his decision to begin a journey of redemption, indicating an acceptanceofresponsibility for his...
imprisonment for the severity of Raniere's crimes and his lack of remorse—they said he showed "a complete lack ofacceptanceofresponsibility for his crimes" and...
Mattheisen's statement saw mixed response, with some praising his acceptanceofresponsibility, while others expressed anger and disgust at the revelations...
public written acceptanceofresponsibility". Retired Federal Judge Arlin Adams served as independent counsel in the first five years of the prosecution...
lifting of the sanctions, contingent on Libya's compliance with the remaining UNSCRs, including acceptanceofresponsibility for the actions of its officials...
devoid of any remorse or specific acceptanceofresponsibility.: 15 Robinson received a life sentence without possibility of parole for each of the five...
“forward-looking” treatment that supports “adaptive disclosure”, combining acceptanceofresponsibility for their past choices with a focus on their ability to contribute...
features of the Poljica Statute are guarantees of freedom but also acceptanceofresponsibility to protect Poljica. The Poljica Statute is a document of priceless...
released by the league, commissioner Roger Goodell cited Williams' acceptanceofresponsibility for his role in the bounty program and pledge to never be involved...
The fat acceptance movement (also known by various other names, such as fat pride, fat empowerment, fat liberation, and fat activism) is a social movement...
over it, which symbolises both the transition to adulthood and acceptanceofresponsibility for religious deed thereafter. The failure to wear the cord and...
although in Montgomery's equivocal acceptanceofresponsibility he blames lack of support, and also refers to the Battle of the Scheldt which was undertaken...
Global Information