Transparency of media ownership in Bulgaria information
See also: Transparency of media ownership in Europe
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page.(December 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Transparency of media ownership refers to the public availability of accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date information about media ownership structures to make possible for media authorities and the wider public to ascertain who effectively owns and controls the media. According to the expert Nelly Ognyanova, lack of transparency in media ownership is one of the major problem in the media system in Bulgaria.[1]
In Bulgaria there are specific provisions concerning print, electronic media and broadcast media. The relevant law, in particular the Law on Radio and Television and the Law on Mandatory Deposition of Press and Other Works, requires the submission of data identifying the actual owners of electronic and print media and online registers are available to the public. Also, a law imposing restrictions on offshore companies to acquire shares and assets in different fields including the media sector, entered into force in 2014. In addition, under Bulgarian law, media are obliged to provide information about ownership upon request in conformity with the provisions set forth in the Law on Access to Public Information. Despite the existence of these legal transparency obligations, there are several problems concerning, on one side the application of the rules, on the other, the requirements themselves, which are not enough effective in ensuring the disclosure of the actual owners. Also, legal requirements are constantly circumvented and sanctions usually not applied. Moreover, according to experts, the law should not be limited to obligations concerning the ownership, but expand its scope to examine the origin of funding of media outlets as well.[1][2]
Overall, despite recent legislative changes, some loopholes remain, allowing non-transparency as regards to media ownership and funding and making possible to circumvent the law and conceal who the true owners of the media are. According to expert Ognyanova, there are several ways of circumventing the legal requirements: one example is the case of Krasikir Gergov, a former agent of the Communist-era State Security services and owner of advertising agencies that, while acting in the guise of a “consultant”, actually had a share of the ownership and a contract allowing him to exercise control over the newsroom of a media outlet in Bulgaria.[1] According to Professor Georgi Lozanov, a former member of the Council for Electronic Media, the introduction of the Access to Information Law could help in making more transparent the media sector, in particular media ownership and sources of funds which are largely opaque in Bulgaria. "There is no transparency of media capital whatsoever and one never knows what the real situation is [...]. The introduction of the Access to Information Act [...] represented an attempt at bringing the media to supply information about the sources and funds. Because, if you set up a media outlet and sell a product which is directly related to freedom of speech, it is normal to be able to track the business from the very beginning, thai is, to track the genealogy of the message in the business sense", remarked Professor Lozanov.[3]
^ abc"Media concentration and media ownership in Bulgaria". www.balcanicaucaso.org. 17 October 2014. Retrieved 5 December 2016.
^"Shedding light on media ownership in Bulgaria: 6 necessary steps". Associations of European Journalists – Bulgaria. 10 November 2015. Retrieved 5 December 2016.
^Petković, Brankica (2004). "Bulgaria" (PDF). Media Ownership and its Impact on Media Independence and Pluralism. Ljubljana: Peace Institute, Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies. p. 94. ISBN 961-6455-26-5.
and 28 Related for: Transparency of media ownership in Bulgaria information
Nelly Ognyanova, lack of transparencyinmediaownership is one of the major problem in the media system inBulgaria. InBulgaria there are specific provisions...
Transparencyofmediaownership refers to the public availability of accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date information about mediaownership structures...
Constitution ofBulgaria guarantees freedom of speech. As a country in transition, Bulgaria'smedia system is under transformation. Bulgaria's mass media are generally...
Transparencyofmediaownership refers to the public availability of accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date information about mediaownership structures...
"The Concentration ofMediaOwnershipin Moldova". Media Azi. Retrieved 2017-02-28. "Transparencyofmediaownershipin the Republic of Moldova" (PDF). Independent...
information laws by country Transparencyofmediaownershipin Europe MediaofBulgariaTransparencyofmediaownershipinBulgaria Freedom of Information, UNESCO...
the Institute of Mass Information (Kyiv), launched the project MediaOwnership Monitor Ukraine to promote transparencyinmediaownership and to map who...
operate in the media field in other countries. In 2009 an effort was pursued to regulate transparencyofownership and ownership concentration in a separate...
As for print media, their obligations in terms ofmediaownershiptransparency are covered by the new Media Law entered into force in 2013. The law requires...
the press industry inBulgaria is rife with “corruption and collusion between media, politicians, and oligarchs.” Mediaownership is opaque, not transparent...
The economy ofBulgaria functions on the principles of the free market, having a large private sector and a smaller public one. Bulgaria is an industrialised...
Europe (Bulgaria, Hungary, Montenegro and Serbia) to the investment fund PPF, for a sum of 2.8 billion euros. As of December 2021. Telenor in Montenegro...
Sharif was favoured in this process because he was a political protégé of the military dictator at the helm. In 2012, Transparency International (TI) calculated...
competitive. However, mediaownership is concentrated in the hands of a few large private media groups which are typically part of wider conglomerates controlled...
legal protection for the media. Assange described WikiLeaks as an activist organisation and said that "The method is transparency, the goal is justice"....
Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) is one of the leading stock exchanges in India, based in Mumbai. NSE is under the ownershipof various financial...
system based on the private ownershipof the means of production and their operation for profit. Central characteristics of capitalism include capital...
comparison of the Ukrainian corruption in a wide global context based on data provided by Transparency International. This research estimated the level of the...
former name Twitter, is a social media website based in the United States. With over 500 million users, it is one of the world's largest social networks...
initiatives were announced in DIFC. Dubai has also developed Internet and Media free zones, offering 100% foreign ownership, no tax office space for the...
political format). In early 2004, the German anti-corruption NGO Transparency International released a list of ten self-enriching leaders in the two decades...
announced policies of "transparency" and "restructuring" (glasnost and perestroika). This revealed the depths of corruption and waste. In April 1989, the...
corruption, says he is "shocked to discover that there is less transparencyin New Brunswick than in Kurdistan, Guatemala or Sierra Leone, despite the huge public...
Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Transparencyofmediaownershipin Europe Tunisia Monitoring Group Turkey's media purge after...
of Ghana deals with corruption, economic malpractice and lack of economic transparency. Despite significant economic progress, obstacles do remain. Particular...
Global Information