This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Precedent" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR(January 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Precedent is a principle or rule established in a legal case that becomes authoritative to a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar legal issues or facts.[1][2][3] The legal doctrine stating that courts should follow precedent is called stare decisis (a Latin phrase with the literal meaning "to stand by things decided").[4]
Common-law legal systems often view precedent as binding or persuasive, while civil law systems do not. Common-law systems aim for similar facts to yield similar and predictable outcomes, and observing precedent when making decisions is the mechanism to achieve that goal. Common-law precedent is a third kind of law, on equal footing with statutory law (that is, statutes and codes enacted by legislative bodies) and subordinate legislation (that is, regulations promulgated by executive branch agencies, in the form of delegated legislation) in UK parlance – or regulatory law (in US parlance).
Case law, in common-law jurisdictions, is the set of decisions of adjudicatory tribunals or other rulings that can be cited as precedent. In most countries, including most European countries, the term is applied to any set of rulings on law, which is guided by previous rulings, for example, previous decisions of a government agency. Essential to the development of case law is the publication and indexing of decisions for use by lawyers, courts, and the general public, in the form of law reports. A precedent is a historical setting example for the future (though at varying levels of authority as discussed throughout this article), some become "leading cases" or "landmark decisions" that are cited especially often.
Generally speaking, a legal precedent may be:
applied (if precedent is binding) / adopted (if precedent is persuasive), if the principles underpinning the previous decision are accordingly used to evaluate the issues of the subsequent case;
distinguished, if the principles underpinning the previous decision are found specific to, or premised upon, certain factual scenarios, and not applied to the subsequent case because of the absence or material difference in the latter's facts;
modified, if the same court on determination of the same case on order from a higher court modified one or more parts of the previous decision; or
overruled, if the same or higher courts on appeal or determination of subsequent cases found the principles underpinning the previous decision erroneous in law or overtaken by new legislation or developments.
In contrast, civil law systems adhere to a legal positivism, where past decisions do not usually have the precedential, binding effect that they have in common law decision-making; the judicial review practiced by constitutional courts can be regarded as a notable exception.
^Precedent. Dictionary.com. Retrieved 6 September 2018.
^Black's Law Dictionary, p. 1059 (5th ed. 1979).
^Pattinson, Shaun D (1 March 2015). "The Human Rights Act and the doctrine of precedent" (PDF). Legal Studies. 35 (1): 142–164. doi:10.1111/lest.12049. ISSN 1748-121X. S2CID 29507544.
^"stare decisis". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
Precedent is a principle or rule established in a legal case that becomes authoritative to a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with...
condition precedent is an event or state of affairs that is required before something else will occur. In contract law, a condition precedent is an event...
In law, a commanding precedent is a precedent whose facts are "on all fours" with the case at hand. In other words, it almost exactly tracks it, sharing...
A precedent book is a document recording procedural, legal or constitutional precedents. Such a book may have significant constitutional effects, such...
Common law (also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by...
over whether Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence had set a precedent in international law that could apply to other separatist movements, or...
docket had seen increased use, and the Court treats these orders as precedential despite the lack of opinions attached to the order. The remaining liberal...
The Nuremberg principles are a set of guidelines for determining what constitutes a war crime. The document was created by the International Law Commission...
The Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents is a large collection of non-litigious legal forms and precedents published by LexisNexis UK. The encyclopaedia...
himself and the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, that they would depart from precedent in the Lords in order to achieve justice. Until the year 1966, the House...
of such principles as "The (Thin End of the) Wedge" and "The Dangerous Precedent": The Principle of the Wedge is that you should not act justly now for...
actually means or whether it represents wise policy," the practice is not a precedent, given the fact "that there has been no consistently observed date at...
The London and North Western Railway (LNWR) Improved Precedent Class or Renewed Precedent Class is a class of 2-4-0 steam locomotives originally designed...
also used interchangeably with common law, is a law that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based...
The London and North Western Railway Precedent Class was a class of seventy 2-4-0 steam locomotives originally designed for express passenger work. They...
ruled that Burmese are not white based on common knowledge and legal precedent. Moreover, courts ruled Filipinos as not white in the following cases:...
Landmark court decisions, in present-day common law legal systems, establish precedents that determine a significant new legal principle or concept, or otherwise...
factors support overruling the precedent. Federal courts may (but need not) adhere to an incorrect decision as precedent, but only when traditional tools...
executive through decrees and regulations; or established by judges through precedent, usually in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals may create legally...
LGBTQ legal precedents such as Obergefell v. Hodges, United States v. Windsor, and Lawrence v. Texas. She said these cases are "binding precedents" that she...
law, to the extent that their decisions in the cases before them become precedent for decisions in future cases. The actual substance of English law was...
Asahi Shimbun newspaper said that the sentences were appropriate based on precedent. In the trial for the 1988 "Nagoya couple murder case" (名古屋アベック殺人事件, Nagoya...
ongoing over the rightful winner and whether or not the ruling should set a precedent. The Roberts Court (2005–present) is regarded as more conservative and...
dealing. Fair use was a common-law (i.e. created by judges as a legal precedent) doctrine in the U.S. until it was incorporated into the Copyright Act...
Singapore in the east. The creation of Eastern Bengal and Assam in 1905 set a precedent for the emergence of Bangladesh. The All India Muslim League was founded...
Errors as to precedent facts, sometimes called jurisdictional facts, in Singapore administrative law are errors committed by public authorities concerning...
Global Information