Global InformationOmphalos hypothesis information
| Part of a series on | ||||
| Creationism | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||
| History | ||||
| Types | ||||
|
||||
| Biblical cosmology | ||||
|
||||
| Creation science | ||||
|
||||
| Rejection of evolution by religious groups | ||||
|
||||
| Religious views | ||||
|
||||
The Omphalos hypothesis is one attempt to reconcile the scientific evidence that the Earth is billions of years old with a literal interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative, which implies that the Earth is only a few thousand years old.[1] It is based on the religious belief that the universe was created by a divine being, within the past six to ten thousand years (in keeping with flood geology), and that the presence of objective, verifiable evidence that the universe is older than approximately ten millennia is due to the creator introducing false evidence that makes the universe appear significantly older.
The idea was named after the title of an 1857 book, Omphalos by Philip Henry Gosse, in which Gosse argued that for the world to be "functional", God must have created the Earth with mountains and canyons, trees with growth rings, Adam and Eve with fully grown hair, fingernails, and navels[2] (ὀμφαλός omphalos is Greek for "navel"), and all living creatures with fully formed evolutionary features, etc., and that, therefore, no empirical evidence about the age of the Earth or universe can be taken as reliable.[3]
Various supporters of Young Earth creationism have given different explanations for their belief that the universe is filled with false evidence of the universe's age,[4] including a belief that some things needed to be created at a certain age for the ecosystems to function, or their belief that the creator was deliberately planting deceptive evidence.[5]
The idea was widely rejected in the 19th century, when Gosse published his aforementioned book.[1] It saw some revival in the 20th century by some Young Earth creationists, who extended the argument to include visible light that appears to originate from far-off stars and galaxies (addressing the "starlight problem").[6]
- ^ a b Roizen, Ron (1982). "The rejection of Omphalos: a note on shifts in the intellectual hierarchy of mid-nineteenth century Britain". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 21 (4): 365–369. doi:10.2307/1385525. JSTOR 1385525. Archived from the original on February 19, 2007.
- ^ Gardner, Martin (2000). Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Debunking Pseudoscience. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 7–14. ISBN 9780393322385.
- ^ "The Return of the Navel | National Center for Science Education". ncse.ngo. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
- ^ "The Age of the Earth – Creationism and the Appearance of Age: Scott Pfahler". apps.usd.edu. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
- ^ "Young Earth Creationism | National Center for Science Education". ncse.ngo. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
- ^ Rice, Stanley (2019). "Creationist funhouse, episode one: The red shift". Skeptical Inquirer. 43 (3): 57–59.