Global Information Lookup Global Information

Murphy v County Wexford VEC information


Murphy v County Wexford VEC
Coat of arms of Ireland
CourtSupreme Court of Ireland
Full case nameKenneth Murphy v. County Wexford VEC
Decided29 July 2004
Citation(s)[2004] IESC 49; [2004] 4 I.R. 202
Transcript(s)https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2004/49.html
Case history
Appealed fromHigh Court
Appealed toSupreme Court
Court membership
Judges sittingMcGuinness J. Fennelly J., McCracken J.
Case opinions
School Authorities owe a duty to those pupils to take reasonable care to ensure that the pupils do not suffer injury
Decision byMcCracken J.
ConcurrenceMcGuinness J., McCracken J.
Concur/dissentFennelly J,
DissentFennelly J.
Keywords
Personal Injruies, liability, Duty of care

Murphy v County Wexford VEC [2004] IESC 49; [2004] 4 IR 202[1] is an Irish Supreme Court case concerning a personal injury case appealed to the Supreme Court from the High Court. The plaintiff suffered serious injuries as a result of "horseplay."[1] The Court held there was a duty of care on the VEC to provide supervision at lunchtime."[2] Despite having implemented steps to control such behaviour, it was found that the defendants/appellants failed in their obligations towards the plaintiff/respondent.[1]

The court found the extent of supervision would depend on different factors, including:[3]

  1. the age of the pupils;
  2. the place where they gather;
  3. the number of students present; and
  4. the likelihood that students may act dangerously.[1]

The courts have said that schools can have physical sports and games as long as the games are risk-assessed, guided, and the right instructions are given.[3]

The cases that have been brought before the courts show how important it is for schools to do risk assessments for things their students do at school. These reviews should list all risks that the school thinks are likely and include a plan for how to deal with them. If an expert opinion as to the suitability of any particular equipment or game is required, this should be asked for.[3]

Schools should also make sure that there is enough guidance, taking into account the age of the students and the activity that will be carried out. If the school has a schedule for keeping an eye on the pupils, it should be followed strictly.[3]

  1. ^ a b c d "Murphy v. County Wexford VEC [2004] IESC 49 (29 July 2004)". www.bailii.org. Retrieved 2023-04-16.
  2. ^ "Choc bar student can keep ?50,000 award". Independent.ie. 29 July 2004. Retrieved 2019-11-22.
  3. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference :2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

and 5 Related for: Murphy v County Wexford VEC information

Request time (Page generated in 0.793 seconds.)

Murphy v County Wexford VEC

Last Update:

Murphy v County Wexford VEC [2004] IESC 49; [2004] 4 IR 202 is an Irish Supreme Court case concerning a personal injury case appealed to the Supreme Court...

Word Count : 1113

List of Irish Supreme Court cases

Last Update:

who is contesting some current application of that provision. Murphy v County Wexford VEC [2004] IESC 49; [2004] 4 IR 202 School Authorities owe a duty...

Word Count : 72

Carlow county football team

Last Update:

Carlow and Wexford Brendan Murphy (Rathvilly) – Leinster MFC runner-up 2007, professional Australian rules player Tommy 'The Boy Wonder' Murphy (Graiguecullen)...

Word Count : 1278

2021 FAI Cup

Last Update:

v Waterford (1) (1) St Patrick's Athletic v Bray Wanderers (2) (2) UCD v Shelbourne (2) (2) Wexford v Cabinteely (2) (3) Maynooth University Town v Malahide...

Word Count : 682

Fitzgibbon Cup

Last Update:

13; Irish Independent, November 23, 1964, p. 14 20 November 1965 (Cork VEC Grounds) semi-finals: UCD 2-10 UCG 3-03, UCC 9-07 QUB 3-01; Sunday Independent...

Word Count : 6438

PDF Search Engine © AllGlobal.net