Relationship between statements that hold true when one logically follows from another
"Entailment" redirects here. For other uses, see Entail (disambiguation).
"Therefore" redirects here. For the therefore symbol ∴, see Therefore sign.
"Logical implication" redirects here. For the binary connective, see Material conditional.
"⊧" redirects here. For the symbol, see Double turnstile.
Logical consequence (also entailment) is a fundamental concept in logic which describes the relationship between statements that hold true when one statement logically follows from one or more statements. A valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion is entailed by the premises, because the conclusion is the consequence of the premises. The philosophical analysis of logical consequence involves the questions: In what sense does a conclusion follow from its premises? and What does it mean for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises?[1] All of philosophical logic is meant to provide accounts of the nature of logical consequence and the nature of logical truth.[2]
Logical consequence is necessary and formal, by way of examples that explain with formal proof and models of interpretation.[1] A sentence is said to be a logical consequence of a set of sentences, for a given language, if and only if, using only logic (i.e., without regard to any personal interpretations of the sentences) the sentence must be true if every sentence in the set is true.[3]
Logicians make precise accounts of logical consequence regarding a given language , either by constructing a deductive system for or by formal intended semantics for language . The Polish logician Alfred Tarski identified three features of an adequate characterization of entailment: (1) The logical consequence relation relies on the logical form of the sentences: (2) The relation is a priori, i.e., it can be determined with or without regard to empirical evidence (sense experience); and (3) The logical consequence relation has a modal component.[3]
^ abBeall, JC and Restall, Greg, Logical Consequence The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
^Quine, Willard Van Orman, Philosophy of Logic.
^ abMcKeon, Matthew, Logical Consequence Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
and 23 Related for: Logical consequence information
Logicalconsequence (also entailment) is a fundamental concept in logic which describes the relationship between statements that hold true when one statement...
thought of as providing accounts of the nature of logical truth, as well as logicalconsequence. Logical truths are generally considered to be necessarily...
deductive argument is usually referred to as "logicalconsequence". According to Alfred Tarski, logicalconsequence has 3 essential features: it is necessary...
specifically on the logical constants used in the premises and the conclusion. On this view, a proposition is a logicalconsequence of a group of premises...
logically equivalent if they have the same truth value in every model. The logical equivalence of p {\displaystyle p} and q {\displaystyle q} is sometimes...
with the deductive nature of the system. The logicalconsequence (or entailment) of the system by its logical foundation is what distinguishes a formal system...
is derivable from a set Γ of sentences of that language is also a logicalconsequence of that set, in the sense that any model that makes all members of...
pointing out that his definition of logicalconsequence depends upon a division of terms into the logical and the extra-logical and he expresses some skepticism...
then }}\Sigma \vdash \phi } that is, for any statement that is a logicalconsequence of Σ {\displaystyle \Sigma } there actually exists a deduction of...
Look up consequence in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Consequence may refer to: Logicalconsequence, also known as a consequence relation, or entailment...
definition, this approach to logical connectives permits the examination of structurally identical propositional forms in various logical systems, where somewhat...
In logic, a logical connective (also called a logical operator, sentential connective, or sentential operator) is a logical constant. Connectives can...
functional values of logical expressions on each of their functional arguments, that is, for each combination of values taken by their logical variables. In...
\wedge } ) is the truth-functional operator of conjunction or logical conjunction. The logical connective of this operator is typically represented as ∧ {\displaystyle...
disjunction, also known as logical disjunction or logical or or logical addition or inclusive disjunction, is a logical connective typically notated...
evidence Consequent, the second half of a hypothetical proposition Logicalconsequence (or entailment), the relationship between statements that holds true...
compactness theorem, demonstrating the finitary nature of first-order logicalconsequence. These results helped establish first-order logic as the dominant...
mathematics, the logical biconditional, also known as material biconditional or equivalence or biimplication or bientailment, is the logical connective used...
the logical semantics, any result of a computation of a concurrent logic program is a logicalconsequence of the program, even though not all logical consequences...
theorem is a logical argument that uses the inference rules of a deductive system to establish that the theorem is a logicalconsequence of the axioms...
for every formula φ in its language, at least one of φ or ¬φ is a logicalconsequence of the theory. Presburger arithmetic is an axiom system for the natural...
the subject. Every categorical proposition can be reduced to one of four logical forms, named A, E, I, and O based on the Latin affirmo (I affirm), for...
languages usually trying to capture the pre-theoretic notion of logicalconsequence. The truth conditions of various sentences we may encounter in arguments...