Justification and excuse are different defenses in a United States criminal case.[1]: 513 Both defenses admit that the defendant committed an act proscribed by law.[1]: 513 The proscribed act has justification if the act had positive effects that outweigh its negative effects, or is not wrong or blameworthy.[1]: 513–4 The proscribed act is excused if the defendant's violation was not entirely voluntary, such as if they acted under duress or under a false belief.[1]: 513–4 Martin v. Ohio (1986) established that states may make justification an affirmative defense, placing the burden of proof on defendant.[1]: 18 Patterson v. New York (1977) established that states may make excuses, such as involving mental state, an affirmative defense, rather than part of the mens rea element the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.[1]: 18
"Conduct... may be either justified... or excused... A defense of justification is the product of society's determination that the actual existence of certain circumstances will operate to make proper and legal what otherwise would be criminal conduct. A defense of excuse, contrarily, does not make legal and proper conduct which ordinarily would result in criminal liability; instead, it openly recognizes the criminality of the conduct but excuses it because the actor believed that circumstances actually existed which would justify his conduct when in fact they did not. In short, had the facts been as he supposed them to be, the actor's conduct would have been justified rather than excused..."[2]
An example is that breaking into someone's home during a fire in order to rescue a child inside, is justified. If the same act is done in the reasonable but mistaken belief that there was a fire, then the act is excused.
What is justified under a utilitarian perspective might be excused under a retributivist standpoint, and vice versa. The American Law Institute Model Penal Code expresses "skepticism that any fine line can be drawn states a fine line between justification and excuse can sensibly be drawn... To say someone's conduct is 'justified' ordinarily connotes that the conduct is thought to be right, or at least not undesirable; to say that someone's conduct is 'excused' ordinarily connotes that the conduct is thought to be undesirable but for some reason the actor is not to be blamed for it."
^ abcdefCriminal Law Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyoris the a Binder
^State v. Leidholm, Supreme Court of North Dakota, 334 N.W.2d 811 (1983), Justice VandeWalle
and 20 Related for: Justification and excuse information
Justificationandexcuse are different defenses in a United States criminal case.: 513 Both defenses admit that the defendant committed an act proscribed...
American jurisprudence, an excuse is a defense to criminal charges that is a distinct from an exculpation. Justificationandexcuse are different defenses...
sinner righteous before God Justification (typesetting), a kind of typographic alignment Rationalization (making excuses), a phenomenon in psychology...
of justificationandexcuse", crimes against the public order, crimes affecting the administration of law and justice, "crimes against morality and decency...
no excuse for genocide. Genocide is often camouflaged as military activity against combatants, and the distinction between denial andjustification is...
being with malice aforethought and without justification or excuse." The elements of the crime are killing (actus reus) and malice aforethought i.e. intentional...
Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in...
concurrence, and X committed no crime. There are two categories of affirmative defenses: justificationandexcuse. Justifications differ from excuses in that...
Dudley and Stephens", Cambrian Law Review, 8: 94 Smith, J. C. (Prof. Sir) (1989), "Chapter 3: Necessity and Duress", JustificationandExcuse in the Criminal...
fide), meaning justification by faith alone, is a soteriological doctrine in Christian theology commonly held to distinguish the Lutheran and Reformed traditions...
affirmative defense is sometimes called a justification or excuse defense. Consequently, affirmative defenses limit or excuse a defendant's criminal culpability...
Walzer and others have characterized supreme emergencies as a justification, others have argued instead that supreme emergencies are an excuse, mitigating...
rely upon any excuse or defense available to him at common law. The defence of necessity is an excuse for an illegal act, not a justification for committing...
Byzantine empire Gorgias' famous Encomium of Helen offers several justifications for excusing Helen of Troy's adultery In Erasmus' In Praise of Folly, Folly...
Hamlyn Lectures are a series of public lectures in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland given annually on a legal topic. The lectures have been...
justification or excuse for committing the offence); rather it is a denial that all the necessary elements to constitute an offence – namely actus reus and simultaneous...
why they engaged in a behavior is engaging in excuses or justifications. While excusesandjustifications aim to minimize blame on the transgressor, the...
if necessary" Under the law, individuals (without lawful right, justification or excuse) are prohibited from: entering any essential infrastructure damaging...
December 2019. Heagney, George (22 July 2019). "Tararua man had "no justification or excuse" for phallus felling". Stuff.co.nz. Stuff Limited. Retrieved 15...
Global Information