Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 information
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 Key Provisions
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
Other short titles
IIRIRA
Long title
An Act making omnibus consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes.
Acronyms (colloquial)
i-RAI-ruh
Nicknames
Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997
Enacted by
the 104th United States Congress
Effective
April 1, 1997[1]
Citations
Public law
Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 104–208 (text) (PDF)
Statutes at Large
110 Stat. 3009-546
Codification
Acts amended
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 Immigration Act of 1990 Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988
Titles amended
8 U.S.C.: Aliens and Nationality
U.S.C. sections amended
8 U.S.C. ch. 12, subch. I § 1101 et seq.
8 U.S.C. ch. 12, subch. II § 1221 et seq.
8 U.S.C. ch. 12, subch. II § 1324
8 U.S.C. ch. 12, subch. II § 1363a
Legislative history
Introduced in the House as H.R. 3610 by C. W. Bill Young (R-FL) on June 11, 1996
Committee consideration by House Appropriations, Senate Appropriations, House Judiciary
Passed the House on June 13, 1996 (278–126, Roll call vote 247, via Clerk.House.gov)
Passed the Senate on July 18, 1996 (72–27, Roll call vote 200, via Senate.gov, in lieu of S. 1894)
Reported by the joint conference committee on September 28, 1996; agreed to by the House on September 28, 1996 (370–37, Roll call vote 455, via Clerk.House.gov) and by the Senate on September 30, 1996 (Agreed voice vote)
Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 30, 1996
United States Supreme Court cases
List
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001)
Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30 (2006)
Vartelas v. Holder, 566 U.S. 257 (2012)
Jennings v. Rodriguez, No. 15-1204, 583 U.S. ___ (2018)
Pereira v. Sessions, No. 17-459, 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
Nielsen v. Preap, No. 16-1363, 586 U.S. ___ (2019)
Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, No. 19-161, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)
Niz-Chavez v. Garland, No. 19-863, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, No. 19-897, 594 U.S. ___ (2021)
Patel v. Garland, No. 20-979, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Garland v. Gonzalez, No. 20-322, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, No. 19-896, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
Biden v. Texas, No. 21-954, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)
United States v. Texas, No. 22-58, 599 U.S. ___ (2023)
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA or IIRAIRA)[2][3] made major changes to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). IIRIRA's changes became effective on April 1, 1997.[1]
Former United States President Bill Clinton asserted that the legislation strengthened "the rule of law by cracking down on illegal immigration at the border, in the workplace, and in the criminal justice system — without punishing those living in the United States legally".[4] However, IIRIRA has been criticized as overly punitive "by eliminating due process from the overwhelming majority of removal cases and curtailing equitable relief from removal".[5] A range of critiques have emerged concerning the provisions enacted with IIRIRA, such as the expansion of aggravated felonies, creation of the 287(g) program, reduction in due process rights, and intensified funding of border militarization.[5][6][7][8] With IIRIRA, all noncitizens, regardless of legal status and including long-term legal permanent residents, became subject to removal and greatly expanded the offenses that could lead to formal deportation.[9]
Proponents of the IIRIRA present the case that the policy provided a much needed end to numerous loopholes present beforehand in US immigration policy, which ultimately undermined their efficacy.[10] The ultimate goal of the IIRIRA has been to deter further illegal immigration into the US, and despite a noticeable increase in annual deportations since the policy was enacted in 1996 from around 50,000 to over 200,000 by the beginning of the 2000s,[11] overall illegal immigration has increased since the policy's enactment according to data compiled by the Pew Research Center.[12]
Before IIRIRA, nonimmigrants who overstayed their visas or violated their status could pay a fine that would allow them to adjust their status to permanent residence status.[13] With IIRIRA, however, lawfully admitted nonimmigrants who overstay their visas by one day or longer became ineligible for a new nonimmigrant visa.[13] If the period of overstay ranged from 180 to 365 days, the noncitizen would face a 3-year bar to reentry, and an overstay of more than 365 days would require a 10-year bar. These provisions impact noncitizens who were admitted before and after the enactment of IIRIRA.[13] In these circumstances, a noncitizen who falls under these categories would be subject to summary removal if attempting to reenter the United States. In these removal proceedings, the noncitizen does not have a right to a hearing or a lawyer and is subject to a 5-year bar of entry.[13]
^ ab"Othi v. Holder, 734 F.3d 259". Fourth Circuit. Harvard Law School. October 29, 2013. p. 265.
^Division C of Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 104–208 (text) (PDF), 110 Stat. 3009-546, enacted September 30, 1996
^This article in most part is based on law of the United States, including statutory and latest published case law.
^Clinton, Bill (1996). "Statement on Signing the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997". Archived from the original on 12 May 2022.
^ abAbrego, Leisy; Coleman, Mat; Martínez, Daniel E.; Menjívar, Cecilia; Slack, Jeremy (2017). "Making Immigrants into Criminals: Legal Processes of Criminalization in the Post-IIRIRA Era". Journal on Migration and Human Security. 5 (3): 694–715. doi:10.1177/233150241700500308. ISSN 2331-5024. S2CID 219950410.
^De Genova, Nicholas (2005). Working the Boundaries: Race, Space, and "Illegality" in Mexican Chicago. Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822387091. ISBN 978-0-8223-3626-6.
^Hing, Bill Ong (2018). "Entering the Trump Ice Age: Contextualizing the New Immigration Enforcement Regime". Texas A&M Law Review. 5 (2): 253–321. doi:10.37419/LR.V5.I2.1. S2CID 158801311.
^Menjivar, Cecilia; Kanstroom, Daniel, eds. (2013). Constructing Illegality in America: Critiques, Experiences, and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107300408. ISBN 978-1-107-30040-8.
^Goodman, Adam (2020). The Deportation Machine: America's Long History of Expelling Immigrants. Princeton University Press. pp. 164–196. ISBN 978-0691182155.
^Stein, Daniel; Barton, Terri (1998). "THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996: NOTABLE CHANGES FOR RESTORING INTEGRITY AND CREDIBILITY TO U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICY". Rutgers Race & L Rev. 1 (1): 111–112. Retrieved 30 May 2022.
^Massey, Douglass; Pren, Karen (30 July 2012). "Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Policy: Explaining the Post-1965 Surge from Latin America". Population and Development Review. 38 (1): 8. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00470.x. PMC 3407978. PMID 22833862.
^Lopez, Mark; Passel, Jeffrey; Cohn, D'Vera. "Key facts about the changing U.S. unauthorized immigrant population". pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center. Retrieved 30 May 2022.
^ abcdFragoman, Austin T. Jr. (1997). "The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996: An Overview". The International Migration Review. 31 (2): 438–460. doi:10.2307/2547227. JSTOR 2547227. PMID 12292878.
and 24 Related for: Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 information
in the form of the IllegalImmigrationReformandImmigrantResponsibilityActof1996. President Bill Clinton signed the Act into law and it became effective...
Illegalimmigration is the migration of people into a country in violation of that country's immigration laws, or the continuous residence in a country...
concerning immigrationand naturalization in the United States Illegalimmigration to the United States Immigration policy of the United States Immigration to...
stay of execution by a Texas state court as the courts examine new evidence. IllegalImmigrationReformandImmigrantResponsibilityActof1996 Immigration...
before an immigration judge). The legal authority for expedited removal (in the IllegalImmigrationReformandImmigrantResponsibilityActof1996 (IIRIRA))...
that the Act would "help protect the American people", would "make our borders more secure", and was "an important step toward immigrationreform". The fencing...
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) is an American anti-immigration think tank. It favors far lower immigration numbers and produces analyses to...
include the ImmigrationActof 1990 (IMMACT), the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), the IllegalImmigrationReformandImmigrant Responsibility...
operation of the provisions of part IV of this subchapter, as amended by the IllegalImmigrationReformandImmigrantResponsibilityActof1996, other than...
Exclusion Actof 1882. This act halted all legal immigrationof Chinese laborers and is considered by many to be the first major exclusionary immigration restriction...
national of the United States." On September 30, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the IllegalImmigrationReformandImmigrantResponsibilityAct (IIRIRA)...