Global InformationHryniak v Mauldin information
| Hryniak v Mauldin | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of Canada | |
| Hearing: 26 March 2013 Judgment: 23 January 2014 | |
| Full case name | Robert Hryniak v Fred Mauldin, Dan Myers, Robert Blomberg, Theodore Landkammer, Lloyd Chelli, Stephen Yee, Marvin Cleair, Carolyn Cleair, Richard Hanna, Douglas Laird, Charles Ivans, Lyn White and Athena Smith |
| Citations | 2014 SCC 7 |
| Docket No. | 34641 [1] |
| Prior history | APPEAL from Combined Air Mechanical Services Inc. v. Flesch, 2011 ONCA 764 (5 December 2011), affirming Bruno Appliance v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2010 ONSC 5490 (22 October 2010). |
| Ruling | Appeal dismissed. |
| Holding | |
| The motion judge did not err in granting summary judgment in the present case, as summary judgment motions must be granted whenever there is no genuine issue requiring a trial. | |
| Court membership | |
| Chief Justice | Beverley McLachlin |
| Puisne Justices | Louis LeBel, Rosalie Abella, Marshall Rothstein, Thomas Cromwell, Andromache Karakatsanis, Richard Wagner |
| Reasons given | |
| Unanimous reasons by | Karakatsanis J |
| Laws applied | |
| Rules of Civil Procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194 Rule 20 (Summary Judgment) | |
Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7[a] is a landmark case of the Supreme Court of Canada that supports recent reforms to Canadian civil procedure in the area of granting summary judgment in civil cases.
- ^ SCC Case Information - Docket 34641 Supreme Court of Canada
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).