Hostage justice information

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (January 2020) Click [show] for important translation instructions. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 1,480 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Justice de l'otage]]; see its history for attribution. You may also add the template {{Translated|fr|Justice de l'otage}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Hostage justice" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Hostage justice (Japanese: 人質司法, Hitojichi shihō) is a Japanese-language phrase used in criticizing the Japanese judiciary. It refers to the period during which a defendant is held while denying an accusation, which is long compared with cases in which a defendant does not deny an accusation in Japanese criminal action procedure. Hostage justice is a system used by police and prosecutors to obtain confessions, regardless of whether the suspect is guilty or not guilty of a crime. Suspects can be held indefinitely under interrogation without charges. False confessions are common under these conditions, which leads to wrongful convictions for the falsely accused. Convictions can include life imprisonment and death.

The Asian Journal of Criminology (2022)^[1] describes 4 main problems in Japan's justice system that systematically mistreat criminal suspects. First being criminal "duty to receive interrogation (Japanese: torishirabe o junin gimu). Here, criminal suspects have the right to remain silent (mokuhiken) yet they are still obligated to endure interrogation- despite its methods. According to study by Takano (2021),^[2] criminal interrogation embodying the practice of high frequency, protracted or undesired acts create the fundamental problem with Hostage Justice as it results in long and unpleasant interrogation against the will of the criminal suspect. Second being restriction between suspect and individual who is not a defense lawyer. Third, police are often given the power to place suspects in detention for “dubious and pretextual purposes”. Fourth being having a “substitute imprisonment” (daiyo kangoku) system where prosecutors often detain suspects in police holding cells (ryuchijo) instead of official detention centers (kochisho) (Croydon 2016^[3]). This makes police interrogation more accessible yet it is also known as the “hotbed of false confessions”(Igarashi, 1984).^[4] All problems point to similar outcomes where criminal suspects give involuntary testimony-affirmation of charges, against their will.

Japan Times^[5] reported the case of Masaaki Okawara, who along with others are accused of illegally exporting spray dryers. In March 2020, Masaaki Okawara, Junji Shimada, and Shizuo Aishima were arrested despite their demonstration of the safety of products to the police. At time of detention, they decided to exercise their right to remain silent and consequently faced poor treatment by the prosecutors. Ashimia’s bail requests were denied numerous times on the basis of potential conspiracy with other employees. This led to his medical needs not being addressed and he passed away due to stomach cancer in February 2021. In the same time, Okawara and Shimade were held in detention for 332 days. In February 2021, Okawara and Shimada bail requests were finally approved and due to a lack of evidence, charges were dropped before the start of trial in August of the same year. In Okawara times of detention, he felt like he was treated as a guilty criminal. Okawara said “I was treated as if I was a slave. With days like these that drained me physically and mentally, I sometimes wondered if it might have been a good idea to admit guilt in order to get out early”. This case stands out in Japan as the conviction rate of prosecutors winning in all indicted cases exceeds 99%. The case sparked attention as charges were dropped rarely after an indictment.

BBC^[6] reported that Carlos Ghosn's, former chairman of Nissan who was arrested for understating his annual salary and misusing company funds in November 2018. Upon his denial, he fled to Japan and immediately got arrested at the Tokyo airport. He was transported to the Tokyo Detention Centre where he was given prison clothes and confined to a cell. Ghosn was also restricted from having any contact with his wife, Carole Ghosn.. “For hours each day, the prosecutors interrogate him, browbeat him, lecture him and berated him, outside the presence of his attorney, in an effort to extract a confession” Said Carole Ghosn (Guardian 2019).^[7] Le Figaro reported that Carlos Ghosn's French lawyers described his continued Japanese detention in a complaint filed with the UNHCR as "hostage justice".^[8] CNN quoted Jeff Kingston, director of Asian studies at Temple University's Japan campus, stating "That system of hostage justice, I think, does not bear scrutiny."^[9]