Global Information Lookup Global Information

Haecceitism information



Haecceitism is a philosophical concept that stems from the field of metaphysics, particularly dealing with the nature of individuality and identity. The term "haecceity" itself comes from the Latin word "haecceitas," which means "thisness."[1] This concept was originally developed in the medieval scholastic philosophy and is often associated with the philosopher Duns Scotus.

In essence, haecceitism focuses on the idea that each individual entity has a unique, unrepeatable quality that makes it different from every other entity. This quality is not dependent on an entity's properties or relations to other things; it's something intrinsic to the entity itself, which is "a set of principles which are essential to it and distinguish it from everything else."[2] James Ladyman characterizes haecceitism as "the claim that worlds can differ solo numero, that worlds can differ de re whilst not differing de dicto, sometimes said, that worlds can differ solely by the permutation of individuals."[3]

For example, consider two completely identical twins. Even if they share all the same properties (like appearance, genetic makeup, etc.), haecceitism holds that there is still something fundamentally different about each twin that makes them distinct individuals. This difference is their "haecceity."

Haecceitism challenges the idea that an individual can be fully described or defined by its properties or relations. Instead, it suggests that there is an irreducible aspect to each individual that makes them uniquely themselves. This concept has implications for discussions about identity over time, the nature of individual objects, and the idea of identity of indiscernibles in philosophy.

In more modern contexts, haecceitism is sometimes discussed in relation to issues of the nature of transworld identity in metaphysics. It raises questions about how we recognize and understand the individuality of objects, and about what it is that makes something the particular thing it is.

  1. ^ Cowling, Sam (2023), "Haecceitism", in Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2023-12-03
  2. ^ Read, Stephen (1995). Thinking About Logic, Oxford UP, p. 249. ISBN 0-19-289238-X
  3. ^ Ladyman, James (2012). Identity, Individuality and Discernibility. University of Oxford Podcasts.

and 3 Related for: Haecceitism information

Request time (Page generated in 0.506 seconds.)

Haecceitism

Last Update:

anti-haecceitism to the thesis of possibility haecceitism is to deny that there is a haecceitistic possibility. Taking a further step, World Haecceitism posits...

Word Count : 600

Haecceity

Last Update:

detail in aesthetic literary criticism. Entitativity Formal distinction Haecceitism Hypostasis Identity of indiscernibles Irreducibility Objective precision...

Word Count : 1410

David Malet Armstrong

Last Update:

Called Metaphysics?. Taylor & Francis. pp. 54–55. ISBN 978-1-136-79269-4. Haecceitism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) "Professor David Armstrong - obituary"...

Word Count : 4307

PDF Search Engine © AllGlobal.net