Global Information Lookup Global Information

GS Media v Sanoma information


GS Media v Sanoma
European Court of Justice
Submitted 7 April 2015
Decided : 8 September 2016
Full case nameGS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., Britt Geertruida Dekker
Case160/15
CelexID62015CN0160
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2016:644
ChamberSecond chamber
Language of proceedingsDutch
Nationality of partiesNetherlands
Procedural historyReference of the Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) of the Netherlands
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
M. Ilešič
President
C. Toader
Judges
  • A. Rosas
  • A. Prechal
  • E. Jarašiūnas
Advocate General
M. Wathelet

GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (C-160/15) is a case decided by the European Court of Justice.[1] The case regards a request for a Preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands on whether hyperlinking to a public third-party website that contains work(s) published without the consent of the rightholder constitutes a "communication to the public" within the meaning of article 3 of the Copyright Directive.[2][3]

The case was decided on 8 September 2016, following the opinion of the Advocate General of 7 April 2016.[4] The Court decided that linking to freely available material placed on the internet without consent of the rights holder(s) constitutes a communication to the public (and thus possibly copyright infringement) if the person placing those links knew this consent was not given. If the link is placed "for profit" to infringing content, the linker is presumed to know about the lack of consent and thus presumed to make a communication to the public.[5]

  1. ^ GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and others, ECLI:EU:C:2016:644 European Court of Justice (European Court of Justice 8 September 2016) ("request for a preliminary ruling").
  2. ^ "Case C-160/15, GS Media – Porn! Hyperlinked and Hyperleaked!". EU Law Radar.
  3. ^ GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and others, ECLI:NL:HR:2015:841 rechtspraak.nl (Hoge Raad 3 April 2015).
  4. ^ Case C160/15, GS Media [1].
  5. ^ More: B. Oręziak, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2016 in Case C 160/15 in the proceedings of GS Media v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., Britt Geertruid Dekker, Comparative Law Review VOL 23 (http://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CLR/article/view/CLR.2017.011)

and 5 Related for: GS Media v Sanoma information

Request time (Page generated in 0.7696 seconds.)

GS Media v Sanoma

Last Update:

GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (C-160/15) is a case decided by the European Court of Justice. The case regards a request for a Preliminary...

Word Count : 1775

SeriesYonkis

Last Update:

Pia Gadd v Retriever Sverige AB, C-366/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:76 (Court of Justice of the European Union 13 February 2014). GS Media v Sanoma Media Netherlands...

Word Count : 1405

Monique Wadsted

Last Update:

copyright. The law in Svensson was later developed in cases such as GS Media v Sanoma. In 2017 she represented Bringwell Sverige AB before the Supreme Court...

Word Count : 542

List of magazines by circulation

Last Update:

2008 at the Wayback Machine "Total Circ for Magazine Media - 2023". Alliance for Audited Media. Retrieved 30 May 2024. "ABC CIRCULATION RESULTS - FEBRUARY...

Word Count : 879

Sevmorput

Last Update:

vaikuttanut vastahankaiselta puhutteluun". Ilta-Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma Media Finland. 24 October 2023. Retrieved 24 October 2023. "В Мурманске произошло...

Word Count : 3492

PDF Search Engine © AllGlobal.net