This article is about reasoning that draws a conclusion by parting an inseparably unified total. For reasoning that draws a conclusion by parting a separable total, see deductive reasoning.
Fallacy
The fallacy of division[1] is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its parts.
An example:
The second grade in Jefferson Elementary eats a lot of ice cream
Carlos is a second-grader in Jefferson Elementary
Therefore, Carlos eats a lot of ice cream
The converse of this fallacy is called fallacy of composition, which arises when one fallaciously attributes a property of some part of a thing to the thing as a whole.
If a system as a whole has some property that none of its constituents has (or perhaps, it has it but not as a result of some constituent's having that property), this is sometimes called an emergent property of the system.
The term mereological fallacy refers to approximately the same incorrect inference that properties of a whole are also properties of its parts.[2][3][4]
^"Division". Retrieved 2024-05-10.
^M. R. Bennett; P. M. S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Table of contents.
^Rom Harré. Behind the Mereological Fallacy. Philosophy 87:3, July 2012, pp. 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819112000241
^P.M.S. Hacker. 2013. Before the Mereological Fallacy: A Rejoinder to Rom Harré. Philosophy, 88(1), 141-148. doi:10.1017/S003181911200054X
and 28 Related for: Fallacy of division information
fallacyofdivision is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its...
The fallacyof composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some...
contain fallacies. Because of their variety, fallacies are challenging to classify. They can be classified by their structure (formal fallacies) or content...
An ecological fallacy (also ecological inference fallacy or population fallacy) is a formal fallacy in the interpretation of statistical data that occurs...
the fallacies of composition and division, the false dilemma, the fallacyof begging the question, the ad hominem fallacy and the appeal to ignorance. There...
A fallacyof illicit transference is an informal fallacy occurring when an argument assumes there is no difference between a term in the distributive (referring...
certain kinds of mistaken proof are often exhibited, and sometimes collected, as illustrations of a concept called mathematical fallacy. There is a distinction...
Fallaciesof definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal...
A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument that may appear to be well-reasoned if unnoticed. The...
Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacyof analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false. It...
The base rate fallacy, also called base rate neglect or base rate bias, is a type offallacy in which people tend to ignore the base rate (e.g., general...
The nirvana fallacy is the informal fallacyof comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume...
In philosophical ethics, the naturalistic fallacy is the claim that it is possible to define good in terms of natural entities, or properties such as pleasant...
The conjunction fallacy (also known as the Linda problem) is an inference that a conjoint set of two or more specific conclusions is likelier than any...
philosophy, a formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur (/ˌnɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər/; Latin for 'it does not follow') is a pattern of reasoning rendered...
The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacyof origins or fallacyof virtue) is a fallacyof irrelevance in which arguments or information are dismissed...
The association fallacy is a formal logical fallacy that asserts that properties of one thing must also be properties of another thing, if both things...
The McNamara fallacy (also known as the quantitative fallacy), named for Robert McNamara, the US Secretary of Defense from 1961 to 1968, involves making...
hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin: 'after this, therefore because of this') is an informal fallacy which one commits when one reasons, "Since event Y followed...
A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacyof refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while...
The Texas sharpshooter fallacy is an informal fallacy which is committed when differences in data are ignored, but similarities are overemphasized. From...
No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect an a posteriori claim from a falsifying counterexample by...
The existential fallacy, or existential instantiation, is a formal fallacy. In the existential fallacy, one presupposes that a class has members when one...
is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses within an argument. It is a type of ambiguity that stems...
slippery slope fallacy. This is a type of informal fallacy, and is a subset of continuum fallacy, in that it ignores the possibility of middle ground and...
rational to persist with a project that outsiders think displays the fallacyof sunk cost. The bygones principle does not always accord with real-world...
The furtive fallacy is an informal fallacyof emphasis in which historical outcomes are asserted to be the result of hidden (furtive) misconduct or wrongdoing...