Global InformationDownsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corp Ltd information
| Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corp Ltd | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Judicial Committee of the Privy Council |
| Full case name | Downsview Mominees Ltd and J.G. Russell v. First City Corporation Ltd and First City Finance Ltd |
| Decided | 19 November 1992 |
| Citations | [1992] UKPC 34 [1993] AC 295 [1993] 1 NZLR 513 [1993] 3 All ER 626 [1993] 2 WLR 86 [1994] 2 BCLC 49 |
| Transcript | BAILII |
| Case history | |
| Prior actions | Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corporation Ltd, [1990] NZCA 21,[1] allowing in part an appeal from First Corporation Corporation Ltd v Downsview Nominees Ltd, [1989] NZHC 566[2] |
| Appealed from | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Lord Templeman, Lord Lane, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Mustill, Lord Slynn of Hadley |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Lord Templeman |
| Keywords | |
Administration
| |
Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corp Ltd [1992] UKPC 34, [1993] AC 295 (19 November 1992) is a New Zealand insolvency law case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council concerning the nature and extent of the liability of a mortgagee, or a receiver and manager, to a mortgagor or a subsequent debenture holder for his actions.
- ^ Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corporation Ltd [1990] NZCA 21, [1990] 3 NZLR 265 (12 March 1990), Court of Appeal (New Zealand)
- ^ First Corporation Corporation Ltd v Downsview Nominees Ltd, [1989] NZHC 566, [1989] 3 NZLR 710 (4 August 1989)