In U.S. law, practices with adverse impacts on specific protected groups
Disparate impact in the law of the United States refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied by employers or landlords are formally neutral. Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil rights laws consider race, color, religion, national origin, and sex to be protected characteristics, and some laws include disability status and other traits as well. Disparate impact can be justified with the normative goal of substantive equality, the equality of outcomes for groups.[1]
A violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act may be proven by showing that an employment practice or policy has a disproportionately adverse effect on members of the protected class as compared with non-members of the protected class.[2] Therefore, the disparate impact theory under Title VII prohibits employers "from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. A facially neutral employment practice is one that does not appear to be discriminatory on its face; rather it is one that is discriminatory in its application or effect."[3] Where a disparate impact is shown, the plaintiff can prevail without the necessity of showing intentional discrimination unless the defendant employer demonstrates that the practice or policy in question has a demonstrable relationship to the requirements of the job in question.[4] This is the "business necessity" defense.[2]
Some civil rights laws, such as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, do not contain disparate impact provisions creating a private right of action,[5] although the federal government may still pursue disparate impact claims under these laws.[6] Although they do not contain explicit disparate impact provisions, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967[7] and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 create a cause of action for disparate impact.[8]
^Fredman, Sandra (2016). "Substantive equality revisited". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 14 (3): 712–738. doi:10.1093/icon/mow043.
^ abEEOC v. Sambo's of Georgia, Inc., 530 F. Supp. 86, 92 (N.D. Ga. 1981)
^Fick, Barbara J. (1997). The American Bar Association guide to workplace law : everything you need to know about your rights as an employee or employer (1st ed.). New York: Times Books. p. 21. ISBN 9780812929287.
^E.g. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 91 S. Ct. 849, 28 L. Ed. 2d 158 (1977)
^Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1908.ZS.html
^"Civil Rights Division Home Page". Archived from the original on July 16, 2015. Retrieved August 12, 2015.
^Smith v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1160.ZS.html
^"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 24, 2017. Retrieved June 27, 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
Disparateimpact in the law of the United States refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people...
In the United States, eminent domain is the power of a state or the federal government to take private property for public use while requiring just compensation...
v. DeStefano: The Tensions Between Equal Protection, Disparate Treatment, and DisparateImpact)". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 165: 692. Herzog...
Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act. This contrasts with disparateimpact, where an employer applies a neutral rule that treats everyone equally...
parties have dealt with discrimination is by bringing disparateimpact claims. In disparateimpact claims, a prima facie case of discrimination is established...
Charges of racial discrimination in voter ID laws are founded in the disparateimpact doctrine of constitutional law, which claims that any action—intentional...
PMID 26002496. Barocas, Solon; Selbst, Andrew D (2016). "Big Data's DisparateImpact". California Law Review. doi:10.15779/Z38BG31.{{cite journal}}: CS1...
with federal protection are questions of facially-neutral laws and disparateimpact, state action, whether sex is deemed a suspect classification, and...
employer's personnel practices, neutral on their face, had an unlawful disparateimpact on them by requiring that they identify the particular policy or requirement...
to mean that it does not generally prohibit voting rules that have disparateimpact on the groups that it sought to protect, including a rule blocked under...
There have been calls for HUD to use disparateimpact as a measure of housing discrimination. HUD's disparateimpact rule was strengthened in 2013 and upheld...
disparateimpact by race. In a further concurrence, Scalia J said "resolution of this dispute merely postpones the evil day" when a disparateimpact might...
Discrimination can be intended and involve disparate treatment of a group or be unintended, yet create disparateimpact for a group. In neoclassical economics...
others, a phenomenon called "adverse impact" or "disparateimpact" in employment law. (In contrast, "disparate treatment" refers to deliberate discrimination...
in schools. There are two groups for these laws: disparate treatment and disparateimpact. Disparate treatment laws allow students the right to testify...
implements a feminist approach to understanding and addressing the disparateimpact that economic development and globalization have on people based upon...
Jeff Landry sued the EPA, challenging the government's use of the disparateimpact standard of the Civil Rights Act, which says policies cannot cause...
prohibits two theories of employment discrimination: disparate treatment and disparateimpact. Disparate treatment occurs when an employer treats an employee...
Fair housing advocates have long argued for the application of the disparateimpact legal theory (historically applied to employment practices) to Title...
Domino's Pizza's policy of not allowing beards for employees created a disparateimpact by excluding a quarter of black men from employment, but not an equivalent...
insurance scores: Impacts on consumers of automobile insurance Archived 11 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine "No Evidence of DisparateImpact in Texas Due to...
Global Information