This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Denying the antecedent" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR(December 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Denying the antecedent, sometimes also called inverse error or fallacy of the inverse, is a formal fallacy of inferring the inverse from an original statement. It is a type of mixed hypothetical syllogism in the form:[1]
If P, then Q.
Not P.
Therefore, not Q.
which may also be phrased as
(P implies Q)
(therefore, not-P implies not-Q)[1]
Arguments of this form are invalid. Informally, this means that arguments of this form do not give good reason to establish their conclusions, even if their premises are true. In this example, a valid conclusion would be: ~P or Q.
The name denying the antecedent derives from the premise "not P", which denies the "if" clause (antecedent) of the conditional premise.
One way to demonstrate the invalidity of this argument form is with an example that has true premises but an obviously false conclusion. For example:
If you are a ski instructor, then you have a job.
You are not a ski instructor.
Therefore, you have no job.[1]
That argument is intentionally bad, but arguments of the same form can sometimes seem superficially convincing, as in the following example offered by Alan Turing in the article "Computing Machinery and Intelligence":
If each man had a definite set of rules of conduct by which he regulated his life he would be no better than a machine. But there are no such rules, so men cannot be machines.[2]
However, men could still be machines that do not follow a definite set of rules. Thus, this argument (as Turing intends) is invalid.
It is possible that an argument that denies the antecedent could be valid if the argument instantiates some other valid form. For example, if the claims P and Q express the same proposition, then the argument would be trivially valid, as it would beg the question. In everyday discourse, however, such cases are rare, typically only occurring when the "if-then" premise is actually an "if and only if" claim (i.e., a biconditional/equality). The following argument is not valid, but would be if the first premise was "If I can veto Congress, then I am the US President." This claim is now modus tollens, and thus valid.
If I am President of the United States, then I can veto Congress.
I am not President.
Therefore, I cannot veto Congress.
[This is a case of the fallacy denying the antecedent as written because it matches the formal symbolic schema at beginning. The form is taken without regard to the content of the language.]
^ abcMatthew C. Harris. "Denying the antecedent". Khan academy.
^Turing, Alan (October 1950), "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", Mind, LIX (236): 433–460, doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433, ISSN 0026-4423
and 28 Related for: Denying the antecedent information
Denyingtheantecedent, sometimes also called inverse error or fallacy of the inverse, is a formal fallacy of inferring the inverse from an original statement...
invalid forms: affirming the consequent and denyingtheantecedent. Constructive dilemma is the disjunctive version of modus ponens. The history of modus ponens...
forms of argument: affirming the consequent and denyingtheantecedent. See also contraposition and proof by contrapositive. The form of a modus tollens argument...
be linked to the premise since the statement is a non sequitur. This is called denyingtheantecedent. An example of denyingtheantecedent would be: If...
Affirming theantecedent (modus ponens) and denyingthe consequent (modus tollens) are valid. Affirming the consequent and denyingtheantecedent are invalid...
ignored in the argument. The fallacy is similar to affirming the consequent and denyingtheantecedent. However, the fallacy may be resolved if the terms are...
undesirable, this pattern is often combined with the formal fallacy of denyingtheantecedent, assuming the logical inverse holds: believing that avoiding...
affirming the consequent and denyingtheantecedent. Affirming the consequent All dogs are animals. Coco is an animal. Therefore, Coco is a dog. Denyingthe antecedent...
argument's conclusion; to assume otherwise is a logical fallacy called denyingtheantecedent. One way to prove that a proposition is false is to formulate a...
conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A. Denyingtheantecedent – the consequent in an indicative conditional...
some fallacies like affirming the consequent or denyingtheantecedent were regarded as valid arguments by the majority of the subjects. An important factor...
The informal fallacy of denyingthe correlative is an attempt made at introducing alternatives where there are none. It is the opposite of the false dilemma...
because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: If A is the set containing...
The Texas sharpshooter fallacy is an informal fallacy which is committed when differences in data are ignored, but similarities are overemphasized. From...
account for a small number of the known fallacies, for example, for affirming the consequent or denyingtheantecedent. Many other fallacies used in natural...
misrepresent the opponent's intentions (see fallacy of quoting out of context). Presenting someone who defends a position poorly as the defender, then denying that...
which is often translated as "The perfect is the enemy of the good" (literally: "The better is the enemy of the good"). The nirvana fallacy was given its...
The McNamara fallacy (also known as the quantitative fallacy), named for Robert McNamara, the US Secretary of Defense from 1961 to 1968, involves making...
Research illustrates a strong bias against ideas from the outside. The reasons for not wanting to use the work of others are varied, but can include a desire...
only errors of form by employing an invalid rule of inference. Denyingtheantecedent is one type of formal fallacy, for example, "If Othello is a bachelor...
equivocation ("calling two different things by the same name") is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple...
Biological tests of necessity and sufficiency Causality Closed concept Denyingtheantecedent If and only if Material implication (disambiguation) Principle of...
fallacy to deny that the group is associated with this undesirable member or action. "No true Scotsman would do something so undesirable"; i.e., the people...
In philosophical ethics, the naturalistic fallacy is the claim that it is possible to define good in terms of natural entities, or properties such as...
at human beings. The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki, which The Independent called "the most apt description...
fallacy in the interpretation of statistical data that occurs when inferences about the nature of individuals are deduced from inferences about the group to...
where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument...
Global Information
