Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs information
1988 Singapore Court of Appeal judgement
Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs
The Old Supreme Court Building, Singapore, photographed in April 2007
Court
Court of Appeal of Singapore
Full case name
Chng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs and others and other appeals
Decided
8 December 1988
Citation(s)
[1988] SGCA 16, [1988] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 525
Case history
Prior action(s)
De Souza Kevin Desmond v. Minister for Home Affairs [1988] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 464, H.C.; Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs [1988] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 30, H.C.
Related action(s)
Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs [1989] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 461, H.C.; [1990] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 347, C.A.; Cheng Vincent v. Minister for Home Affairs [1990] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 38, H.C.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting
Wee Chong Jin C.J., L.P. Thean and Chan Sek Keong JJ.
Case opinions
Exercise of discretion by President and Minister for Home Affairs under ss. 8 and 10 of the Internal Security Act subject to judicial review by a court as an objective rather than subjective test applies.
Chng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs is a seminal case in administrative law decided by the Court of Appeal of Singapore in 1988. The Court decided the appeal in the appellants' favour on a technical ground, but considered obiter dicta the reviewability of government power in preventive detention cases under the Internal Security Act ("ISA"). The case approved the application by the court of an objective test in the review of government discretion under the ISA, stating that all power has legal limits and the rule of law demands that the courts should be able to examine the exercise of discretionary power. This was a landmark shift from the position in the 1971 High Court decision Lee Mau Seng v. Minister of Home Affairs, which had been an authority for the application of a subjective test until it was overruled by Chng Suan Tze.
Chng Suan Tze was followed by amendments by Parliament to the Constitution and the ISA in 1989 which purported to return the applicable law regarding judicial review of government discretion under the ISA to that in Lee Mau Seng. The legality of these changes was challenged in Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs (1990). In that decision, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the legislative amendments to the Act were plain and unambiguous, and thus validly established that the subjective test of judicial review now applied to internal security matters.
and 24 Related for: Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs information
Constitution. Although the Court of Appeal held in the 1988 case ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs that the courts could review the legality of detentions...
element of arbitrariness was also mentioned by the Court in ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988) – it said a law that allows a public authority...
also viewed restrictively by the Singapore courts. In ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988), the Court of Appeal took the view that an objective...
impropriety – was adopted by the Singapore Court of Appeal in ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988). Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case preferred to use...
Khawaja v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] UKHL 8, [1984] A.C. 74, H.L. (UK) ("Khawaja"). ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs [2]...
called LawNet, which is also managed by the Academy. ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988) was a landmark Court of Appeal case in administrative...
Union". Citing the Singapore Court of Appeal's dictum in ChngSuanTzevMinisterforHomeAffairs that "all power has legal limits", it envisaged the Adjudication...
judgment was later disapproved by the Court of Appeal in ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988), in 1989 Parliament amended the Constitution and...
Although the Court of Appeal held in the seminal 1988 case ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs that the courts could review the legality of detentions...
the Constitution. For example, in ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988), the Court of Appeal adopted an objective test for reviewing ministerial...
Williams v. Institute of Technical Education [1999] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 529 at 537, para. 28, C.A. (Singapore). ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs [1988]...
The Singapore Court of Appeal affirmed the GCHQ case in ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs (1988), and Singapore courts have largely been consistent...
that no reasonable authority would have arrived at it: ChngSuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs [1988] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 525 at 564, para. 121, C.A. (Singapore)...
appeal from those judgments to the Court of Appeal in Chng SuanTzev. MinisterforHomeAffairs. In the latter case, the Court of Appeal held in a landmark...
Global Information