Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 (also titled Hay v Young) is a Scottish delict case, on the subject of how extensive an individual's duty is to ensure others are not harmed by their activities. The case established important boundaries on the scope of recovery for bystanders, or those uninvolved with physical harm. Where a woman suffered psychiatric harm after walking onto the scene of a motorcycle accident, she was deemed not to be a foreseeable victim, having not been in immediate danger of physical harm.
BourhillvYoung [1943] AC 92 (also titled Hay vYoung) is a Scottish delict case, on the subject of how extensive an individual's duty is to ensure others...
haddock and herring, were carried on their backs in creels. The case BourhillvYoung of 1942 concerned a pregnant Glasgow fishwife who had suffered psychiatric...
contemplation. "The duty to take care," as I essayed to formulate it in Bourhillv. Young, "is the duty to avoid doing or omitting to do anything the doing...
Tremain v Pike [1969] 1 WLR 1556 Smith v Leech Brain & Co [1961] 2 QB 405 BourhillvYoung [1943] AC 92, 108 Scott v Shepherd (1772) 95 ER 525 King v Sussex...
Smith v Donnelly 2001 SLT 1007 Sutherland v HM Advocate 1994 SLT 634 BourhillvYoung [1943] AC 92 Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 SC(HL) 31 Hughes v Lord Advocate...
good sense of the judge to ensure, adopting Lord Wright's language in BourhillvYoung [1943] AC 92, 110, that the thing stops at the appropriate point. His...
McAllister, Ben T.; Flower, Graeme; Ivanov, Eugene N.; Goryachev, Maxim; Bourhill, Jeremy; Tobar, Michael E. (December 2017). "The ORGAN experiment: An axion...
O. Devote* 937 48.09 Labour Kevin McDonnell* 931 Conservative Neil T. Bourhill 495 25.18 Conservative Richard Bevan 482 Lib Dem Spotlight Team Keith Moffitt...
Global Information