Bethell v Hildyard 38 Ch.D. 220. [1885 B. 2119.] is an important legal judgment of the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice, England.[1] The matter heard before Justice Striling concerned succession to property by the child of a marriage contracted by Christopher Bethell, an English man in Bechuanaland South Africa with Teepoo, a Barolong woman according to the customs of the Baralong people.[2]
The marriage was held not to be a valid marriage according to the law of England because the customs of the Baralong people permitted polygamy. The child was held not entitled to succeed to her father's property.
^Validity of Foreign marriage, Harvard Law Review Vol. 25, No. 4, Feb 1912 p374.
Bethell v Hildyard 38 Ch.D. 220. [1885 B. 2119.] is an important legal judgment of the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice, England. The matter...
Cooper 1897: Blanche Bingley Hillyard 1898: Charlotte Cooper 1899: Blanche Bingley Hillyard 1900: Blanche Bingley Hillyard 1901: Charlotte Sterry 1902:...
marked by widening partisan, generational divides". Pew Research Center. Hillyard, Vaughn (November 20, 2015). "Trump's plan for a Muslim database draws...
original on August 1, 2019. Retrieved August 1, 2019. Seitz-Wald, Alex; Hillyard, Vaughn (November 5, 2019). "In stunning upset, Democrat Beshear is apparent...
son is supporting Clinton, but emphasized he's strongly behind Trump. Hillyard, Vaughn (May 7, 2016). "Former GOP Nominee Bob Dole Endorses Donald Trump"...
original (PDF) on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 12, 2016. "Nameoki Twp. v. Granite City Twp". CaseMine. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District...