This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Argumentum ad crumenam" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR(June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
An argumentum ad crumenam argument, also known as an argument to the purse, is the informal fallacy of drawing conclusions based on the speaker's financial status.[1] The term generally refers to the assumption that having wealth is indicative of insight or virtue, and that poverty denotes the opposite.[1]
The opposite is the argumentum ad lazarum.
Examples:
"If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"
"This new law is a good idea. Most of the people against it are riff-raff who make less than $20,000 a year."
"Warren Buffett is hosting a seminar. This seminar is better than others, because Warren Buffett is richer than most people."
^ abFellmeth, Aaron X.; Horwitz, Maurice (2021). "Argumentum ad crumenam". Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780197583104.001.0001/acref-9780197583104-e-257. ISBN 9780197583104.
and 13 Related for: Argumentum ad crumenam information
An argumentumadcrumenam argument, also known as an argument to the purse, is the informal fallacy of drawing conclusions based on the speaker's financial...
summarized as the statement, "Poor, but honest." The opposite is the argumentumadcrumenam. Some experimental evidence supports the appeal to poverty. A 2017...
tradition (argumentumad antiquitatem) – a conclusion supported solely because it has long been held to be true. Appeal to wealth (argumentumadcrumenam) – supporting...
Global Information