An abstention doctrine is any of several doctrines that a United States court may (or in some cases must) apply to refuse to hear a case if hearing the case would potentially intrude upon the powers of another court. Such doctrines are usually invoked where lawsuits involving the same issues are brought in two different court systems at the same time (such as federal and state courts).
The United States has a federal court system with limitations on the cases that it can hear, while each state has its own individual court system. In some instances, the jurisdiction of these courts overlap, so a lawsuit between two parties may be brought in either or both courts. The latter circumstance can lead to confusion, waste resources, as well as cause the appearance that one court is disrespecting the other. Both federal and state courts have developed rules determining when one court will defer to another's jurisdiction over a particular case.
and 17 Related for: Abstention doctrine information
An abstentiondoctrine is any of several doctrines that a United States court may (or in some cases must) apply to refuse to hear a case if hearing the...
Abstention is a term in election procedure for when a participant in a vote either does not go to vote (on election day) or, in parliamentary procedure...
been validly ratified. Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) Abstentiondoctrine, under which federal courts in diversity jurisdiction can let state...
courts, with coverage of topics such as justiciability, abstentiondoctrines, the abrogation doctrine, and habeas corpus. United States federal judge Judicial...
ecclesiastical (i.e., "relating to the Christian Church or its clergy") abstentiondoctrine in the case of Michael O'Keefe v. OC. O'Keefe is suing OC over his...
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux 360 U.S. 25 (1959) Abstentiondoctrine Barenblatt v. United States 360 U.S. 109 (1959) upholding conviction...
supra note 142; Martha A. Field, Abstention in Constitutional Cases: The Scope of the Pullman AbstentionDoctrine, 122 U. PA. L. REV. 1071 (1974). Pullman...
The Erie doctrine is a fundamental legal doctrine of civil procedure in the United States which mandates that a federal court called upon to resolve a...
federal district court dismissed Moore's suit, ruling that under the abstentiondoctrine, federal courts generally do not interfere with ongoing state court...
Baird v. State Bar of Arizona Younger v. Harris 401 U.S. 37 (1971) Abstentiondoctrine Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe 401 U.S. 402 (1971) Judicial...
broadcasting networks Burford v. Sun Oil Co. 319 U.S. 315 (1943) Abstentiondoctrine Altvater v. Freeman 319 U.S. 359 (1943) justiciability and declaratory...
Procedure Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. 312 U.S. 496 (1941) Abstentiondoctrine Cox v. New Hampshire 312 U.S. 569 (1941) petitions on public property...
litigation going on in state courts, following the Colorado River abstentiondoctrine. In that case, the federal government sued for adjudication of certain...
court should therefore not be confused. The mootness doctrine can be compared to the ripeness doctrine, another court rule (rather than law), that holds...
The abrogation doctrine is a US constitutional law doctrine expounding when and how the Congress may waive a state's sovereign immunity and subject it...
seeking relief consents to be bound by the judgment of the court. The doctrine of consent is also extended to defendants who attend and litigate actions...
Global Information