Any person in the UK who is significantly affected by a public body's act can challenge a decision by judicial review. The claims usually begin in the High Court.
Administrative law
General principles
Administrative court
Delegated legislation
Exhaustion of remedies
Justiciability
Ministerial act
Ouster clause
Prerogative writ
Certiorari
Habeas corpus
Mandamus
Prohibition
Quo warranto
Rulemaking
Ultra vires
Grounds for judicial review
Fettering of discretion
Legitimate expectation
Nondelegation doctrine
Procedural justice
Natural justice
Due process
Fundamental justice
Proportionality
Unreasonableness
Wednesbury
Patent unreasonableness
Administrative law in common law jurisdictions
Australia
Canada
Singapore
South Africa
United Kingdom
Scotland
United States
Administrative law in civil law jurisdictions
China
Mongolia
Ukraine
Related topics
Constitutional law
v
t
e
United Kingdom administrative law is part of UK constitutional law that is designed through judicial review to hold executive power and public bodies accountable under the law. A person can apply to the High Court to challenge a public body's decision if they have a "sufficient interest",[1] within three months of the grounds of the cause of action becoming known.[2] By contrast, claims against public bodies in tort or contract are usually limited by the Limitation Act 1980 to a period of 6 years.[3]
Almost any public body, or private bodies exercising public functions,[4] can be the target of judicial review, including a government department, a local council, any Minister, the Prime Minister, or any other body that is created by law. The only public body whose decisions cannot be reviewed is Parliament, when it passes an Act.
Otherwise, a claimant can argue that a public body's decision was unlawful in five main types of case:[5] (1) it exceeded the lawful power of the body, used its power for an improper purpose, or acted unreasonably,[6] (2) it violated a legitimate expectation,[7] (3) failed to exercise relevant and independent judgement,[8] (4) exhibited bias or a conflict of interest, or failed to give a fair hearing,[9] and (5) violated a human right.[10]
As a remedy, a claimant can ask for the public body's decisions to be declared void and quashed (or certiorari), or it could ask for an order to make the body do something (or mandamus), or prevent the body from acting unlawfully (or prohibition). A court may also declare the parties' rights and duties, give an injunction, or compensation could also be payable in tort or contract.[11]
^Senior Courts Act 1981 s 31(3)
^Civil Procedure Rules rule 54.5 claims can be made up to 'three months after the grounds to make the claim first arose', but the period can be shorter if legislation says so.
^Limitation Act 1980 ss 2 and 5. But under s 11, the period is three years for personal injury or death, under s 11A ten years for defective products, and under s 15 twelve years to recover land.
^R (Datafin) v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers [1987] QB 815
^Different books and cases categorise the grounds to review administrative discretion differently, as do different fields of law such as directors' duties in UK company law, unfair dismissal in UK labour law or implied terms in English contract law. Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case said the grounds were "illegality", "irrationality" and "procedural impropriety". A Le Sueur, M Sunkin and J Murkens, Public Law Text, Cases, and Materials (3rd edn 2016) ch 16 follows this. It is often, however, unclear how a procedural requirement of the law can be separated from substance, and it was thought that "irrationality" is too restrictive. AW Bradley, KD Ewing and CJS Knight, Constitutional and Administrative Law (2014) ch 24 now suggests substantive grounds, legitimate expectations and procedural grounds. In R (Baker) v Devon CC [1995] 1 All ER 73, 88, Sir Robin Cooke said 'The administrator must act fairly, reasonably and according to law. That is the essence and the rest is mainly machinery.' M Elliott and R Thomas, Public Law (3rd edn 2017) ch 12 generally follows this. Another categorisation of Lord Bingham, Rule of Law (2010) was 'Ministers and public officers at all levels must exercise the powers conferred on them in good faith, fairly, for the purposes for which the powers were conferred, without exceeding the limits of such powers and not unreasonably.' Contrast the Companies Act 2006 ss 171-177, codifying directors' duties.
^Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40 (following law). Padfield v Minister of Agriculture [1968] AC 997 (improper purpose), R v Home Secretary ex p Venables and Thompson [1998] AC 407 (irrelevant consideration).
^Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 (unreasonableness loosely defined); Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (legitimate expectation rejected). R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex p Coughlan [2001] QB 213 (legitimate expectation upheld)
^R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60 (independent judgement)
^Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67 (bias). R v Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) [2000] 1 AC 119 (possibility of a conflict of interest).
^Human Rights Act 1998 ss 3-6
^Senior Courts Act 1981 s 31(1)
and 29 Related for: United Kingdom administrative law information
UnitedKingdomadministrativelaw is part of UK constitutional law that is designed through judicial review to hold executive power and public bodies accountable...
United States federal administrativelaw encompasses statutes, regulations, rules, common law rulings, and directives issued by the Office of Information...
The administrative geography of the UnitedKingdom is complex, multi-layered and non-uniform. The UnitedKingdom, a sovereign state to the northwest of...
patents under UnitedKingdom patent lawUnitedKingdom company law UK commercial law UK competition lawUnitedKingdom trade mark law "Two jurisdictions:...
In the UnitedKingdom, a tribunal is a specialist court with jurisdiction over a certain area of civil law. They are generally designed to be more informal...
Administrativelaw is a division of law governing the activities of executive branch agencies of government. Administrativelaw includes executive branch...
actions that no other person or body in the UnitedKingdom can undertake, such as declaration of war. Case law exists to support both views. Blackstone's...
An administrativelaw judge (ALJ) in the United States is a judge and trier of fact who both presides over trials and adjudicates claims or disputes involving...
Council England portal Law portal English tort lawUnitedKingdomadministrativelaw Craig, Paul (14 August 2008). AdministrativeLaw (6th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell...
The primary law governing nationality in the UnitedKingdom is the British Nationality Act 1981, which came into force on 1 January 1983. Regulations...
South African administrativelaw is the branch of public law which regulates the legal relations of public authorities, whether with private individuals...
The UnitedKingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known as the UnitedKingdom (UK) or Britain, is a country in Northwestern Europe, off...
Internet censorship in the UnitedKingdom is conducted under a variety of laws, judicial processes, administrative regulations and voluntary arrangements...
Law enforcement in the UnitedKingdom is organised separately in each of the legal systems of the UnitedKingdom: England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern...
are common law constraints on the decision-making process of a body. Unlike in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States, English law does not...
Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 is a landmark UnitedKingdomadministrativelaw case which concerned the relationship between the courts and the state...
which enforced mercantilist legislation in the UnitedKingdom, was too weak to enforce its own laws until 1748. Thomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle...
Human rights in the UnitedKingdom concern the fundamental rights in law of every person in the UnitedKingdom. An integral part of the UK constitution...
Tribunal is a superior court of record and general tribunal in the UnitedKingdom. It was created in 2008 as part of a programme, set out in the Tribunals...
Carltona doctrine (or Carltona principle) expresses the idea that, in UnitedKingdomlaw, the acts of government departmental officials are synonymous with...
government body which can be seen as causing an injustice. The law in the UnitedKingdom says Ombudsmen must investigate maladministration. The definition...
yet officially use the name 'UnitedKingdom'. See AW Bradley, KD Ewing and CJS Knight, Constitutional and AdministrativeLaw (2018) ch 2, 32-48. F Pollock...
In the UnitedKingdom, byelaws are laws of local or limited application made by local councils or other bodies, in specific areas using powers granted...
Since 1922, the UnitedKingdom has been made up of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales (which collectively make up Great Britain) and Northern Ireland...
UnitedKingdom insolvency law regulates companies in the UnitedKingdom which are unable to repay their debts. While UK bankruptcy law concerns the rules...
The United States Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum Facility (USP Florence ADMAX), commonly known as ADX Florence or the Florence Supermax, is an American...
The rule of law is one of the longest established common law fundamental principles of the governance of the UnitedKingdom, dating to Magna Carta of...
Judiciary of Northern Ireland Law of the UnitedKingdom Election court English law Scots law Northern Ireland law Welsh law "Written Statement: Update on...
Global Information