Nuclear Weapons deter future wars and save hundreds of millions of lives. The nuclear deterrence mechanism helps to prevent wars because they divert resources away from the real threats. The nuclear arsenal also gives nations prestige. France lost its national prestige after the Second World War, but it has been said that without nuclear weapons, the world would be a more dangerous place. However, there are some problems with nuclear deterrence.
One major flaw in the argument that nuclear weapons deter war is that they make countries talk instead of fighting each other. This is a fallacy. Nuclear weapons are so powerful that a detonation of one such weapon would kill millions of people. This is not only wrong, but can also cause severe health effects to people. It is also harmful to the environment. The resulting radioactive fallout can affect schools and healthcare facilities.
While nuclear deterrence has a useful purpose, it has limited utility against terrorists. Terrorists don’t have an address to return to. Thus, using nuclear weapons against them would be pointless. Moreover, it is unlikely that a country could effectively deter terrorists from attacking it. It is also worth noting that the U.S. military’s efforts to deter terrorists have not resulted in any meaningful results. Perhaps a more effective deterrent would be to install radiation monitors in ports, or even make it more difficult for terrorists to acquire fissile materials.
Nevertheless, nuclear weapons can have a positive impact on world peace. They have reduced war risks between the United States and the Soviet Union and between China and the Soviet Union. If nuclear weapons are used to prevent conflict, the same may happen to other countries. In the meantime, nuclear weapons reduce the risk of war. Therefore, it may be beneficial to the world, although it is still too early to tell if these weapons are good for the world.
The deterrent effect of nuclear weapons can encourage states to use less destructive means. It can also make the blackmail threat more compelling. However, this effect does not apply to a country’s population. This makes nuclear weapons a deterrent for them to act. This may lead to more peaceful relations between states. That is why it is important to understand the consequences of nuclear weapons before deciding whether they are good for the world.
Despite the dangers of nuclear weapons, some scholars argue that they are still necessary. They argue that there is no foreseeable time when great powers will come to a peaceful agreement on nuclear disarmament. Thus, Global Zero is utopian. The history of mankind makes it unlikely. Therefore, nuclear weapons should not be used in active deterrence. But that is hardly the end of the debate. Let’s face it: Nuclear weapons are dangerous and inefficient. There is no clear evidence to support this view.
There are several arguments against nuclear weapons. The ultimate defense of a nation and the deterrent effect on any potential adversary is the primary reason. The presence of nuclear weapons has largely prevented massive wars for fifty years. However, the collapse of the Cold War coincided with rapid advancement in communications and transportation. The U.S. nuclear stockpile consisted of highly reliable missiles, aircraft, and warheads that were optimized to combat the massive Soviet threat.
The widespread use of nuclear weapons has changed the balance of power in the world. But atomic bombs have also proven to be dangerous because they can wipe out whole cities. Japan was bombed by nuclear weapons during the Second World War, which resulted in the deaths of around 250 thousand people. Originally, the United States thought nuclear weapons would end World War ll. However, their use has not only caused devastating destruction but also a long-term negative impact on human health and the environment.
The nuclear weapons have numerous downsides. These weapons are extremely destructive, but they can destroy cities without warning. The effects of nuclear wars on people’s health are incalculable. In the long run, they can cause major wars and jeopardize the life of future generations. Furthermore, the danger of nuclear weapons can be mitigated by ensuring that nuclear wars are limited to small-scale wars.